read as under:
"65,. Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 to apply -- The
provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (2 of
1974) shall ... 102 but even assuming that a
bank account is a `property' within the meaning of
Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Police , 1988 Criminal Law Journal 240
(Vol.94), and analysed the provisions of Section 102 of
the Criminal Procedure Code and the facts ... Special
Criminal Application No.6404 of 2016, held as under;
" Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure at
the outset deserves reference
Police , 1988 Criminal Law Journal 240 (Vol.94), and
analysed the provisions of Section 102 of the
Criminal Procedure Code and the facts ... Special
Criminal Application No.6404 of 2016, held as under;
" Section 102 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure at the outset deserves reference
Section 102 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”),
which reads thus:
“102. Power of police officer to seize ... borne in mind in interpreting the provisions of
Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the
underlying object engrafted therein, inasmuch as if
there
102 but even assuming
that a bank account is a `property' within the meaning of
Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ... Police , 1988 Criminal Law Journal 240
(Vol.94), and analysed the provisions of Section 102 of
the Criminal Procedure Code and the facts
102 but even assuming that a
bank account is a `property' within the meaning of
Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ... Criminal Law Journal(Vol.100) 645, a learned
Single Judge of Karnataka High Court examined the
provisions of Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure
Code
102 but even assuming that a bank account is a
`property' within the meaning of Section 102 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure ... Police , 1988 Criminal Law Journal
240 (Vol.94), and analysed the provisions of Section 102 of the
Criminal Procedure Code and the facts
same being property within
the meaning of section 102 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, and therefore, it would
not be correct to say that ... therefore, only by applying
the provisions of Section 102 of the
Criminal Procedure Code if the said
provision is held to be conferring power
argument is that Section 102 of the Code is to be interpreted to include immovable property to ensure that criminals do not walk away with ... property" used in sub-
section (1) of Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 would mean to include "immoveable property
police may have power to seize a passport
under Section 102 CrPC if it is permissible within the authority
given under Section 102 ... seizes a passport (which it has power to do under Section
102 CrPC), thereafter the police must send it along with a letter
