Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 108 (0.71 seconds)

Bhoora Singh vs State Of U.P. on 12 July, 1991

Singh , AIR 1990 SC 209 : 1990 Cri LJ 562 (Supra), Under Section 113A of the Evidence Act, presumption raised as to abatement of suicide ... Court and the question was as to whether the provisions of Section 113A which were procedural has retrospective application. It was held under para
Allahabad High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Shiv Kumar vs State on 24 April, 2018

State of Rajasthan4 the Supreme Court has held that Section 113A of the Evidence Act relates to offences under Section 498A ... Section 304B I.P.C. There is a clear distinction between Sections 113A and 113B of the Evidence Act. Even under Section 113B the prosecution
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sharda Devi vs State Of U.P. on 15 June, 2016

prosecution the learned trial Judge has rightly raised the presumption under section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act. According to him the impugned judgment ... this, the Court has given statutory guideline in the form of section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, which reads as under: "Presumption
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - P Kumar - Full Document

Bhoora Singh vs State on 25 March, 1992

question had arisen as to whether the presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act could be raised in the said case ... legislative intent behind the enactment of Sections 304B , 498A , IPC. and Section 113A and 113B of the Indian Evidence Act. The accused in the said
Allahabad High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next