Haryana Police.
The Petitioners are further assailing vires of Rule 12.8 and
13.18 of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934, as applicable to State of Haryana ... Further, the Rules of
confirmation i.e. Rule 12.8 and 13.18 are different for direct recruits and the
promotees as they provide for different period
passed any order for confirming the
petitioner in tune with Rule 13.18 of Punjab Police Rules despite the fact
that the petitioner was promoted ... Police,
Headquarters, Gurugram reads as follows:
" That as per rule 13.18 of Punjab Police Rules (applicable to the State of
Haryana) all officials should
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal on 14 July, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIR 2020
Anilkumar Vaikuthlal Patel vs O.L.Of A'Bad Jubili Spinning & Mfg. ... on
2019 IA ORDER
13.18 According to the applicant, the Indian Admiralty Act, 2017,
is vastly different. Section 5(1) of the Admiralty Act, 2017, states
Sahitya Mudranalaya Private Limited ... vs Additional Director General on 29 January, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam ... vs Central Electricity Regulatory ... on 9 November, 2020
JUDGMENT OF
Kailash Auto Finance Ltd. 38.37 4.12 89.29%
c) Matra Kaushal 47.06 13.18 71.99%
Enterprises
4.4 The Ld. counsel of assessee submitted that there
existing laboratories are not functioning to
their potential, it is unforgivable.
13.18. There is no Joint Director appointed all 3
posts (100%) are vacant
contract and he did work of only Rs. 1.32 Crores out of 13.18
Crores within this period, but no action was taken by the concerning
