tribunal examined the events of delay and entered the finding at paragraph
13.18 of the Award that both parties failed to perform their respective
obligations ... drawing reference to paragraphs 13.1 to 13.18 of the Award, he
pointed out that the arbitral tribunal dealt with the delay events under four
heads
Rejected
6. Mahindra & - 18.83
Mahindra Ltd
7. VST Tillers Tractors - 13.18
Ltd.
Arithmetic Mean 7.05 15.06
13.4 Aggrieved by the action
Prathap Kumar G vs State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2022
Author: Suraj Govindaraj
Bench
SECTION 153A, 131A, 120B, 122,
123, 124A OF IPC AND UNDER SECTION 13.18,20 OF UNLAWFUL
ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION)ACT.
THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD
relevant to the A.Y. 2004-05. The
total amount involved is 13.18 means Rs. 13,18,000/-. Below
the entry
owning intangibles could not be compared with
the software development services provider.
13.18 The similar view has been taken in the case of A/cate
Ito Ward-4(1)(4),, Ahmedabad vs Valley Comtrade Pvt Ltd ( Earlier Known ... on 28
sixteen comparables selected
by the assessee happens to be at 13.18%. Ld. TPO accepted four out of
sixteen comparables selected by the assessee and rejected
ègÀÄzÁV «ªÀgÀuÉ
¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛg.É DzÀgÉ £ÉÆêÀÄ£ï C¢®ï gÀªg
À ÀÄ 13.18 JPÀgÉ RĶÌ
d«ÄãÀÄ ¸ÉÃj MlÄÖ 65.20 JPÀgÉ d«ÄÃ
Courl dated 03.02.2021, 36.06.2021, 71.09.2024.
2822027, 7074. 3021. 22.44. 2024,.6.12. 2085 13.18 2021,.05.01.2022,25.1.2022
47.02.2022, 6.05 2022 &16.08.2022 ane upan heanng
