Ramdas Shriwas ... on 12 March, 2026
2026:BHC-AUG:10632
1 cra 13.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL ... solicited on the ground that it was needed for the
2 cra 13.18
business of his son. It is contended that the respondent
committed default
Elegna Co-Op Housing And Commercial ... vs Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction ... on 15 January, 2026
1
Metal Closures Pvt Ltd vs Smt. Muniyamma on 9 April, 2026
Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Bench
challenged the territorial jurisdiction of
the Court.
OTHER MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS
13.18 The plaintiff's chose not to file replication to the defendants'
written
condone delay by invoking Section
5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
13.18. In Amrawati, the Hon'ble Allahabad High
Court was concerned with
Doddegowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 March, 2026
Author: Suraj Govindaraj
Bench: Suraj
several; the claims cannot be split or partly referred to
arbitration.
13.18. Reliance was further placed on Ameet Lalchand Shah v. Rishabh
Enterprises
permitted to
contend that there was no encroachment at all.
13.18. Learned counsel further relies upon the daily
order dated 26.10.2023 passed
material in a holistic manner and arrive at a
reasoned conclusion.
13.18. The documentary material reveals two strands
of evidence. The school records
land to be leased. The Petitioners assert
that the lease should cover 13.18 acres. However, MHADA contends that only 4.3
acres should be leased ... larger area of 13.18 acres involves different
stakeholders (Respondents 8 and 10), whereas the Petitioners (Respondent 9) are
concerned only with 4.3 acres
