CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 136 of 2019
With
R/CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 137 of 2019
With
R/CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 138 ... matter of Civil
Revision Application No.137 of 2019.
9. Same is the case with respect to Civil Revision
Application No.138
Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag dated 15th February 2003 in Criminal Revision Application No. 138 of 2001.
3. The above Criminal Revision Application was preferred ... above order of Chief Judicial Magistrate preferred Criminal Revision Application No. 138 of 2001 on 28th December 2001, challenging issuance of process and summoning them
Second, an order dated 23 rd April 2025 in
Revision Application No. 138 of 2025, whereby the
Divisional Joint Registrar was persuaded to allow
application for impleadment, respondent Nos. 4 to 26 herein filed
Revision Application No.51 of 2000 and, during pendency of the
said revision application ... proper and legal.
Accordingly, by order dated 29.8.2000, the Revisional Authority
allowed Revision Application No.138 of 2000 and quashed and set
aside the order
aside the order
dated 372014 passed in LB Revision Application No.
138/2013 as well as the order dated 2642013
passed ... learned Collector, Ahmedabad passed in LB
Revision Application No. 138 of 2013 and also the
order dated 2642013 passed by the City Deputy
revision
application under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code
would lie to the High Court against the order in a
revision application passed ... that case that revision application would lie to the
Sessions Court but against the order of the Sessions
Court whether revision application would
revision application under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code would lie to the High Court against the order in a revision application passed ... that case that revision application would lie to the Sessions Court but against the order of the Sessions Court whether revision application would
cognate revision had filed application Exh. 25 before the trial Court. In application Exh. 22, respondent No. 2 in the first revision application and accused ... respondents of Revision Application No. 305 of 2001. In other words, it could not be said that the contesting respondent of Revision Application
Nasik, the State Government initially had filed Criminal Revision Application No. 138 of 2002 and subsequently as per the leave granted by this Court vide
plaintiff on the suit land. The application is liable to be rejected".
ORDER
Application is rejected.
No order as to costs.
Dated ... reference of issue No. 1 to tenancy Court in Civil Revision Application No. 138 of 1985. Defendants-Ganpatrao and Kamlabai have also preferred Civil Revision
