Section 143 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Section 143 in The Railways Act, 1989
143. Penalty for unauthorised carrying on of business of procuring and supplying of railway tickets
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20477 (4.92 seconds)Puja Travels vs The Union Of India Through The Chairman ... on 6 March, 2024
Railway e-tickets. They have their
centers for e-ticketing at their respective offices outside the
premises of Patna Railway Station and Rajendra Nagar Railway ... Railway Act is a penal
provision for unauthorized carrying on all business procuring and
supply of Railway tickets. The provision runs thus:
"143. Penalty
Aditya Singh vs Union Of India on 18 August, 2017
Force (RPF), Durg (C.G)
for the offence punishable under Section 143 of Railways Act,
1989.
2. As per the prosecution case ... contemplated under
section 143 of the Act, therefore, in case of issue of E-
Tickets through IRCTC, section 143 of the Railways
Public Prosecutor vs Gopal Ojha S/O Shri Sarya Prakash Ojha ... on 17 April, 2023
passengers. Herein, he further
referred the evidence and provisions under Section 143 of
Railways Act and submitted that the evidence clearly indicated
that respondent Suresh ... held that Section 143 (1) of Railway Act is not
applicable on railways employee though Section 143 (2) is
attracted on railways employee.
(Downloaded
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Mukesh & Ors on 19 October, 2006
prosecuted.
Whereas the said Suresh Shah was charged under Section 143 (1) of
the Railway Act, 1989, Respondents herein were charged under Section
143 ... discretion in the matter but to issue
tickets.
Section 143(1) of the Railways Act reads, thus:
"143. Penalty for unauthorised carrying
Arti Meena D/O Shri Dhanji Lal Meena vs Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur on 18 July, 2019
Dhanji Lal Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Quarter No. 143, Railway Colony, Sawaimadhopur Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar
Ravi Gupta S/O Shri Kedar Mal Gupta vs Rajasthan High Court Jodhpur on 18 July, 2019
Dhanji Lal Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Quarter No. 143, Railway Colony, Sawaimadhopur Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar
Priya Gupta vs General Manager, North Eastern ... on 11 September, 1958
143 of the Railway Establishment Code every railway ser-vant must sign an agreement. The said rule runs as follows ;
"143. Service agreement. Every ... when a railway servant enters into a service agreement at the time of entering the railway service Rule 148 of the Railway Establishment Code, either
Rajesh Anil vs State Of Kerala on 17 July, 2008
second respondent for the offence punishable under
Section 143(1)(a) of the Railways Act, 1989.
2. The facts which led to the above case ... licence and
thereby committed the offence punishable under Section
143(1)(a) of the Railways Act, 1989. Accordingly, the
second respondent requested before the Magistrate
Kriti Gour D/O Sh. Abhisheak Gour vs High Gourt Of Judicature For Rajasthan on 18 July, 2019
Dhanji Lal Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Quarter No. 143, Railway Colony, Sawaimadhopur Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar