being called to the police station on 12.10.2008,
through notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C, he was interrogated during
which he made disclosures confirming ... only stated that there was no
Crl.A.No.1368/2013 Page 15 of 32
notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C and that
court below has failed to consider that the mandatory requirement of Section 160 Cr.P.C. was violated while taking statements from the victim girls ... medical evidence, is taken contrary to the mandatory requirement of Section 160 Cr.P.C. and that their statements were not voluntary and have
interrogated the Appellant and gave him a notice under
Section 160 Cr.P.C. to appear on the next day. According to PW-17, after ... Hari Prakash Gulia says that a notice
under Section 160 Cr.P.C. was given to the Appellant to come to the Police
Station
court below has
failed to consider that the mandatory requirement of Section 160 Cr.P.C. was
violated while taking statements from the victim girls ... medical evidence, is taken contrary to
the mandatory requirement of Section 160 Cr.P.C. and that their statements
were not voluntary and have
only once after he was
issued a notice under Section 160 CrPC by
Inspector Prabhakar. He stated having made an
entry in roznamcha ... Page 19 of 160 pages
20
statement till he was served with notice under
Section 160 CrPC. As per PW13, when he reached
only once after he was
issued a notice under Section 160 CrPC by
Inspector Prabhakar. He stated having made an
entry in roznamcha ... Page 19 of 160 pages
20
statement till he was served with notice under
Section 160 CrPC. As per PW13, when he reached
gone to serve one notice u/s 160 CrPC which was purportedly in the
name of the accused. PW17 is the investigating officer ... gone to serve one
notice u/s 160 CrPC upon one Suresh Kumar Panewala. He deposed that he
served the same
police
station in compliance of a notice given under Section 160 Cr.P.C.
Accused Sarabjeet was also interrogated and he also confessed his
guilt ... same date i.e. 27.04.2008, by virtue of a notice under
Section 160 Cr.P.C. Until unless IO would have been sure about arrest
after serving on Sajjo notice under Section 160 CrPC
to join investigation in Delhi, the police team alongwith
the IO returned to Delhi ... village
Shahjungi on 21.02.03 where they served notice under
Section 160 CrPC on Sajjo and returned to Delhi on the
night
Subhash @ Nandu .
addresses. Due to paucity of time, no notice U/s 160 Cr.PC could be
served to any of the said persons. Thereafter ... names and
addresses. Due to paucity of time, no notice U/s 160 Cr.PC could be
FIR No. 330/14 Page
