Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

CRIMES 38, (2004) 2 ALLCRILR 162, (2004) 15 INDLD 336, (2004) 1 CHANDCRIC

SUPREME 689, (2005) 4 JLJR 162, (2006) 1 ESC 34, (2006) 1 UPLBEC 158 Bench: Arijit Pasayat , C.K. Thakker CASE NO.: Appeal (civil

SCALE 5, (2009) 6 KANT LJ 413, (2009) 43 OCR 162, (2009) 2 RECCRIR 597, (2009) 2 CURCRIR 533, (2010) 68 ALLCRIC

lodged on 27-1-1996 was not maintainable in terms of Section 162 of the Code, and the learned SDJM should not have acted ... shall be taken. 15. Coming to the applicability of Section 162 of the Code, as contended by the accused persons, the object and scope

162, 2004 CRILR

SCALE 637, (2009) 74 ALLINDCAS 162 (SC), (2009) 1 DLT(CRL) 438, 2009 (3) SCC (CRI) 1166, (2009) 1 CHANDCRIC 269, (2009) 64 ALLCRIC

Therefore, the so-called FIR by PW15 is one covered by Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code ... report lodged by the informant PW-15 was hit by Section 162 of the Code. The case of conspiracy has been clearly made

constitute substantive evidence and these parades are essentially governed by Section 162 of the Code. Failure to hold a test identification parade would not make

incident. Therefore, the statement made was hit by provisions of Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short

State of Bihar (JT (2003) Supp (2) 354)]. The Explanation to Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code ... omissions are not contradictions. As the Explanation to Section 162 of the Code shows, an omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement