Noida Entrepreneurs Assn vs Noida & Ors on 15 January, 2007
UPLBEC 962, (2007) 2 ESC 262, (2007) 1 CAL LJ 162
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.45 seconds)Iqbal Bano vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 5 June, 2007
SUPREME 98, (2007) 58 ALLCRIC 824, (2007) 4 EASTCRIC 162, (2007) 3 MAD LW 671, (2007) 3 ALLCRIR 2898, (2007) 8 SCALE
State Of U.P vs Atar Singh And Ors on 12 November, 2007
ANDHLT(CRI) 376 SC, 2008 (1) ALD(CRL) 162
Author: Arijit Pasayat
Bench: Arijit Pasayat , D.K. Jain
CASE NO.:
Appeal
Kumari Suman Pandey vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr on 14 February, 2007
162, AIR 2007 SC (SUPP) 621, (2007) 2 EASTCRIC 182, (2007) 2 ALLCRIR 1383, (2007) 1 CURCRIR 499, (2007) 2 JLJR 74, (2007) 3 SCALE
State Of U.P vs Mushtaq Alam on 25 July, 2007
SCALE 363, (2007) 3 CHANDCRIC 162, 2007 CHANDLR(CIV&CRI) 128, (2006) 4 ALLCRILR 483
Author: Arijit Pasayat
Bench: Arijit Pasayat , P.P. Naolekar
CASE
Manjuri Bera vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. And Anr on 30 March, 2007
each of the claims and, subject to the provisions of
Section 162 may make an award determining the amount of compensation which
appears
Amitsingh Bhikamsing Thakur ... vs State Of Maharashtra ..Respondent on 5 January, 2007
constitute substantive evidence and these parades are
essentially governed by Section 162 of the Code. Failure to
hold a test identification parade would not make
Mrs. Hafizun Begum vs Md. Ikram Heque And Ors on 24 July, 2007
each of the claims and, subject to the
provisions of Section 162 may make an award
determining the amount of compensation
which appears
Heera & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 June, 2007
constitute substantive evidence and these parades are
essentially governed by Section 162 of the Code. Failure to
hold a test identification parade would not make
U.B. Gadhe & Ors. Etc.Etc vs G.M., Gujarat Ambuja Cement Pvt. Ltd on 28 September, 2007
award
passed in Reference L.C.A. Nos. 139/1998,
146/1998, 162/1998, 145/1998 and
150/1998 dated 23rd April, 1999 are hereby