Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 315 (0.83 seconds)

Babu Singh vs State Of Punjab on 28 August, 1962

Trial-Confession-Voluntariness of-Circumstances showing confession involuntary-Duty of Magistrate recording confession Code of Criminal Procedure , 1898 (Act V of 1898, ss.164 ... Criminal Procedure . Section 164 of the Code confers power on the magistrate specified in s. 164(1) to record statements and confessions. Section 164
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 38 - Full Document

Maharaj Deen And Anr. vs The State on 6 June, 1994

conclusion that if the Magistrate, who had recorded the confession under 164 Cr.P.C . had not put questions to the accused before recording statement ... were required to be taken by the Magistrate before recording confession under Section 164 Cr.P.C. were not observed. 36. For the reasons stated
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Hopeson Ningshen vs C B I on 20 November, 2019

making of the confession and it is sufficient to stamp the confession as involuntary and hence unreliable. A judicial confession not given voluntarily is unreliable ... when such a confession is retracted, the conviction cannot be based on such retracted judicial confession. (vii) Non-compliance with Section 164 CrPC goes
Delhi High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - G S Sistani - Full Document

Atmaram Namdeo vs State Of Maharashtra on 1 April, 1968

powers duly invested in him to record statements or confessions under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If the Magistrate did not have ... Criminal Procedure, would have the necessary jurisdiction to record confession under Section 164 . It is not apparently disputed in this case that the District Magistrate
Bombay High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next