Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 460 (0.95 seconds)

Sidheshwar Nath vs Emperor on 11 December, 1933

confession by oral testimony. The argument is that the Magistrate was bound I to record the confession under Section 164 , (Criminal P.C., and that ... Section 164 . The statements did not purport to have been recorded under Section 164 and even if they could be regarded as confessions the learned
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Surendra Koli vs C.B.I. on 16 October, 2023

transcription of recorded confession Retraction of confession by the accused Law on confession:- (i) Confession is viewed with circumspection; (ii) Confession has to be read ... each part of the confession (iv) Confession must be voluntary and true; (v) Burden to prove that confession is voluntary is on the prosecution
Allahabad High Court Cites 97 - Cited by 0 - A K Mishra - Full Document

Surendra Koli vs C.B.I on 16 October, 2023

transcription of recorded confession Retraction of confession by the accused Law on confession:- (i) Confession is viewed with circumspection; (ii) Confession has to be read ... each part of the confession (iv) Confession must be voluntary and true; (v) Burden to prove that confession is voluntary is on the prosecution
Allahabad High Court Cites 98 - Cited by 0 - A K Mishra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next