Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1116 (1.21 seconds)

Shanti And Anr. vs The State on 4 May, 1977

approach the subject of confessions and particularly of judicial confessions, as though every record or evidence of confession is to be treated as 'prima ... explain to the confessant that he was not bound to make a confession and that any confession made by him would be used as evidence
Orissa High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Shanti And Anr. vs The State on 4 May, 1977

approach the subject of confessions and particularly of judicial confessions, as though every record or evidence of confession is to be treated as 'prima ... explain to the confessant that he was not bound to make a confession and that any confession made by him would be used as evidence
Orissa High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raja Ram vs State on 14 October, 1965

held that: ".....this confession cannot be taken in evidence as a Magistrate can record a confession under Section 164 Criminal Procedure Code during ... accused person to confess at any stage of the inquiry or trial but a record of his confession under Section 164 Cr. P. C. cannot
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next