reorganization of the State of Punjab
under the Punjab Reorganization Act, 1966 , the staff which was
working at Bhakra Nangal and Beas Project under ... virtue of the
provisions of Section 79(4) of the Reorganization Act, 1966. There is
2 of 19
::: Downloaded
Single Judge,
are contradictory as, at one stage, the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 has
been held to be not applicable but, the relief of interest ... interest should not be 15% as envisaged under the Sugarcane
(Control) Order, 1966, but should instead be determined under Section 34 of
the Code
Single Judge,
are contradictory as, at one stage, the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 has
been held to be not applicable but, the relief of interest ... interest should not be 15% as envisaged under the Sugarcane
(Control) Order, 1966, but should instead be determined under Section 34 of
the Code
Single Judge,
are contradictory as, at one stage, the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 has
been held to be not applicable but, the relief of interest ... interest should not be 15% as envisaged under the Sugarcane
(Control) Order, 1966, but should instead be determined under Section 34 of
the Code
Single Judge,
are contradictory as, at one stage, the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 has
been held to be not applicable but, the relief of interest ... interest should not be 15% as envisaged under the Sugarcane
(Control) Order, 1966, but should instead be determined under Section 34 of
the Code
Single Judge,
are contradictory as, at one stage, the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 has
been held to be not applicable but, the relief of interest ... interest should not be 15% as envisaged under the Sugarcane
(Control) Order, 1966, but should instead be determined under Section 34 of
the Code
Single Judge,
are contradictory as, at one stage, the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 has
been held to be not applicable but, the relief of interest ... interest should not be 15% as envisaged under the Sugarcane
(Control) Order, 1966, but should instead be determined under Section 34 of
the Code
Single Judge,
are contradictory as, at one stage, the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 has
been held to be not applicable but, the relief of interest ... interest should not be 15% as envisaged under the Sugarcane
(Control) Order, 1966, but should instead be determined under Section 34 of
the Code
Single Judge,
are contradictory as, at one stage, the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 has
been held to be not applicable but, the relief of interest ... interest should not be 15% as envisaged under the Sugarcane
(Control) Order, 1966, but should instead be determined under Section 34 of
the Code
adoption of Punjab Civil
Services Rules, Punjab Government Employees (Conduct) Rules,
1966, Notification, Model Standing Orders etc. for the Officers/official
of PRTC and, therefore ... adoption of Punjab Civil Services Rules, Punjab
Govt. Employees (Conduct) Rules, 1966,
Notification, Model Standing Orders etc., for the
officers/officials of PRTC. This decision
