Rules'] for the
period of service rendered between April 29, 1966 till September 28,
1978 when he was released from Army on compassionate grounds ... this document
Chandigarh
CWP No. 2058 of 1996 -2-
April 29, 1966 onwards. His pay was fixed accordingly. Because of
denial of weightage of seniority
This mutation has also not been challenged in court. On 11th January, 1966,
Kishan Singh-vendee initiated partition proceedings with respect to the suit
land ... partitioned
share whereby mutation was sanctioned in his favour on 6th May, 1966. This
was mutation No.3016 Ex.D4 which is also
charged with commission of breach of the
Punjab Government Employees (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and instructions
issued by Haryana Government and the High Court in this ... submitted that
Clause 2 of the Punjab Government Employees (Conduct) Rules, 1966
provided that no government employee shall except with previous
knowledge of the prescribed
State of West Bengal & another Vs. Nripendra
Nath Bagchi AIR 1966 SC 447, the scope of Article 235 of the
Constitution of India came ... thereto. In the
State of West Bengal v. Nripendra Nath Bagchi AIR 1966 SC 447
this Court has pointed out that control under Article
backdrop of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ; The
Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 and the Central Civil Services (Temporary
Service) Rules, 1965. One of the questions ... shall be undertaken by the Central Government on and from
November 1, 1966. The Supreme Court found no substance in the contention
of the Union
Punjab Service
of Engineers Class-II (Public Work Department) (Public Health) Rules,
1966 on the ground that they do not specifically provide for promotion ... Punjab
Services of Engineer Class-II PWD (Public Health) Rules 1966 (for short
"the Rules") and there is no provision in the Rules
were in service in composite
state of Punjab prior to Ist November, 1966 and came over to
Haryana State on or after Ist November, 1966 ... have
been recruited by the Haryana Government on or after Ist
November, 1966, or who are transferred to the Haryana State
from the Central Government
conveyed under Section 82(8) of the Punjab Re-organisation Act,
1966 to the inclusion of the names of the Provincialised staff of
the former ... provision of Section 82(6) of the Punjab Re-
organization Act, 1966. I am to request that as in the case of
Punjab Government, necessary
petitioners plead that they sought return of land acquired in 1966 i.e. after
40 years of acquisition and indisputably having received the compensation ... petitioners before this Court vested in the State Government in 1966. There
is no provision in the Act for release of land after acquisition except
Polachi v. Sri
Tiruppur Karur Transports (P) Ltd., Tirippur , AIR 1966
Madras 470. A somewhat similar view was taken by their
Lordships of the Supreme ... Court in Cumbum Roadways (P)
Ltd. v. Somu-Transport (P) Ltd. , AIR 1966 SC 1366 and also
in Hanuman Transport Co. Ltd. v. Meenakshi
