paragraph 44 of the PRA of 2008
would be applicable to the DSC service. Merely because the respondents, if
granted condonation in DSC service would ... also in the PRA of 2008, are not applicable to the DSC.
17. Finally, they contend that the PRA of 2008, on which the petitioners
paragraph 44 of the PRA of 2008
would be applicable to the DSC service. Merely because the respondents, if
granted condonation in DSC service would ... also in the PRA of 2008, are not applicable to the DSC.
17. Finally, they contend that the PRA of 2008, on which the petitioners
paragraph 44 of the PRA of 2008
would be applicable to the DSC service. Merely because the respondents, if
granted condonation in DSC service would ... also in the PRA of 2008, are not applicable to the DSC.
17. Finally, they contend that the PRA of 2008, on which the petitioners
paragraph 44 of the PRA of 2008
would be applicable to the DSC service. Merely because the respondents, if
granted condonation in DSC service would ... also in the PRA of 2008, are not applicable to the DSC.
17. Finally, they contend that the PRA of 2008, on which the petitioners
paragraph 44 of the PRA of 2008
would be applicable to the DSC service. Merely because the respondents, if
granted condonation in DSC service would ... also in the PRA of 2008, are not applicable to the DSC.
17. Finally, they contend that the PRA of 2008, on which the petitioners
paragraph 44 of the PRA of 2008
would be applicable to the DSC service. Merely because the respondents, if
granted condonation in DSC service would ... also in the PRA of 2008, are not applicable to the DSC.
17. Finally, they contend that the PRA of 2008, on which the petitioners
paragraph 44 of the PRA of 2008
would be applicable to the DSC service. Merely because the respondents, if
granted condonation in DSC service would ... also in the PRA of 2008, are not applicable to the DSC.
17. Finally, they contend that the PRA of 2008, on which the petitioners
Petitioners have not questioned the DSC Rules 2006 or the
Guidelines issued in September 2008. It appears that each of these
Petitioners has been ... been made clear in Clause 8 of the September 2008 Guidelines that
the DSC Rules would apply to the shopping complexes covered
agreement to sell dated 11th February 2008, the
Plaintiff was left with no right in the property at DSC-138, DLF South
Court, Saket ... Delhi). She
submitted that allotment of DSC-138 at Saket was cancelled on 22nd
April 2008 and this in turn led to the termination
West),
Mumbai-400053. M/s. D.S. Constructions Limited (DSC), respondent
Arb. P. No.90/2008 Page 1 of 15
no.1 herein is also ... stated clause. It has also written letters dated 8th January, 2008
to the MD, DSC for appointing an independent arbitrator.
28. The plea
