Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

applicant) sought quashment of letter no.DSC-37/Class-III/252/05/08 dated 16th October, 2008 issued by the Senior Divisional Personnel Officer

from 01.02.2006 (09.11.2007 according to the respondents) but the Departmental Screening Committee (DSC) declared him unfit on the ground that applicant could not achieve ... DSC was contrary to the law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in Dev Dutt vs. Union of India , (2008

instead of rejecting the same outright. 8. In the instant case, the DSC met on 5.6.2014 whereas the below benchmark ACR of the applicant ... below benchmark ACR for the year 2007-08 on 19.6.2014, the DSC had already met on 5.6.2014 and considered the applicants case and kept

eligible officers for grant of NFUG to SAG by the first DSC meeting, another proposal for grant of NFUG to SAG was initiated, wherein ... vide its OM No.AB.14017/64/2008- Estt(RR) dated 1.07.2010. This effective date in case of the applicant was 3.01.2006. The case

2006 abandoned on 31st March, 2011, patent application bearing no. 2710/CHENP/2008, patent application no. 4922/DELNP/2010, though all these applications related ... have failed to file any technical analysis either in the form of DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry), TGA (Thermogravimetric Analysis) or XRD (X- Ray Diffraction

facing of criminal case. Sr. Div. Security Commissioner RPF, Ambala Division Sr. DSC-Incharge of PRTC/Jehankhelan-Hoshiarpur" 4. It is contended ... Mohindergarh. The petitioner was arrayed as an accused in FIR No.154/2008, Police Station Kanina, and alleged to have committed offence under Section

Policy) by an order dated 16th May 2006 holding that the DSC was not covered in any schedule to the DVAT Act and was accordingly ... confirmed levy of differential tax together with interest. By order dated 3rdJanuary 2008, the VATO separately held the Appellant liable to pay the penalty

Policy) by an order dated 16th May 2006 holding that the DSC was not covered in any schedule to the DVAT Act and was accordingly ... confirmed levy of differential tax together with interest. By order dated 3rdJanuary 2008, the VATO separately held the Appellant liable to pay the penalty

CPAN No. 757/2011,17/09/2012 in WP No. 5257/2008 passed by the High Court Of Calcutta) OM SHREE CONTRACTORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS ... SIGNED FOR MS. JYOTI, SR. P.A. AS SHE IS NOT HAVING DSC AND ATTENDED COURT counsel for the respondents. ….2/-  -2- The grievance

following judgments/orders: 1. CIT Vs. Karnal Cooperating Sugar Mills Ltd. (2008), 118 Taxman 489. 2. Bongaigaon Refinary And Petrochemicals ... 2008. 8. M/s Phoenix Lamps India Ltd. vs. CIT, Income Tax Appeal No.2 of 2012 (Alld.). 9. CIT vs. Jaypee DSC Ventures