post of School Assistant (English) as per his merit obtained
in DSC 2008 in the existing vacancies by granting time to produce ... rules, recruitment notification was issued on
08.12.2008, which is called as DSC 2008 notification. An errata
was published on 09.02.2009. The last date for receipt
proceedings,
dated 07.03.2017, for appointment of Language Telugu Pandit in DSC
2008, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and
against the principles of natural ... proceedings, dated
07.03.2017 for appointment of Language Telugu Pandit in DSC 2008
Ranga Reddy District.
3. Heard Sri Jagdish Kothapally, learned counsel for the petitioner
recruitment to the posts of
Physical Education Teachers (Urdu) in DSC, 2008, by taking
into consideration the note appended to Rule 4 of the Rules
Ashoka DSC Katni
Bypass, Nashik for the A.Y. 2008-09 in which similar issue
was decided by the Tribunal in assessee's favour
Screening Committee (DSC) for
this purpose met on 05.06.2014. However, on finding that
the ACR of the applicant for the year 2008 ... year 2014. The DSC met in the year 2015
and then again the case of the applicant was considered.
When the DSC
vacancies may be carry forward to the next DSC and
even in the subsequent DSC also if none of the candidates are
available, then ... doing so, they have conducted general
recruitment in the year 2008. Even, in 2008, no candidate was
available for reserved posts and as such
background facts are that by an advertisement published on 20 th
February, 2008, the Respondent No.1 school invited applications for the post
of librarian ... DSC Act‟) and Delhi School Education Rules,
1973 („DSE Rules‟).
3. The Appellant applied for the said post and vide letter dated 8th April 2008
date of joining for DSC 1995
batch, whereas the seniority list of Multi-Purpose Health
Assistants in DSC, 1999 was fixed based on the merit ... vide
proceedings dated 29.01.2010. Therefore, O.A.No. 11018 of
2008 was filed before Andhra Pradesh Administrative
Tribunal to fix integrated seniority as per rank
relied
on a series of decisions.
1. CIT vs. Jaypee Dsc Ventures Ltd. (ITA No.357/2010
dated 16.12.2010 (Delhi-HC)
2. CIT vs. Indo ... Swiss Jewels Ltd. (2005) 284 ITR 389
(Bom.)
3. Lok Holdings (2008) 308 ITR 256 (Bom.)
4. CIT vs. Koshika Telecom
date, i.e. 01.09.2008 falls in the financial year of
2008-09. Therefore for granting MACP, the reckonable ACRs
pertains the year ... necessary that all five ACRs have
to be very good. The DSC (Departmental Screening
4
Committee) may make an assessment following due
procedure."
(Emphasis
