Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

possible." (iii) yet another Supreme Court decision reported in (2011) 11 SCC 275 in the case of K.K.Velusamy vs. N.Palanisamy

relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2009) 4 SCC 410 in the matter of Vadiraj Naggappa Vernekar (Dead) Through ... also the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2011) 11 SCC 275 in the ] lgc 8 of 21 ::: Downloaded on - 24/02/2015

2011 (4) SCC 240 6. 2010 (4) SCC 329 7. 2011 (11) SCC 275 8. 2016 (3) ALD 162 (SC) 9. (2013) 14 SCC

Code cannot be routinely 18 (1970) 1 SCC 732 Signature Not Verified 19 (2011) 11 SCC 275 Digitally Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI CS (COMM

Supreme Court in K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy (2011) 11 SCC 275 as under: "12. The respondent contended that Section 151 cannot

Supreme Court in Bagai Construction vs Gupta Building Material Store (2013) 14 SCC 1. The Honourable Supreme Court thereafter, http://www.judis ... Honourable Supreme Court in K.K.Velusamy vs N.Palanisamy (2011) 11 SCC 275, wherein in Para-19 it was observed as under

SCC 410 2.(2013) 14 SCC 1 3.2003 (1) ALD 790 4.2003 (2) ALD 558 5.(2011) 11 SCC 275

case of K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy , 2011 (11) SCC 275, it was held as under: "12................................ (a) Section

Rathore vs. Dhannjay Rao Jadhav & Ors. ) Palanisamy, reported in (2011) 11 SCC 275 has observed as under:- "9. There is no specific provision

parties. The said power is not 13 (2011) 11 SCC 275 Signature Not Verified CM(M) 616/2022 Page 11 of 15 Digitally Signed ... evidence which could not be produced when the 2 (2011) 11 SCC 275 evidence was being recorded. Order 18 Rule 17 is primarily a provision