Uttar Pradesh & Anr. 2013 (11) SCC 476; State of Karnataka vs. M.
Devendrappa & Anr. 2002 (3) SCC 89; Shri Anur Kumar Jain ... 2010 (D.B.); K. K. Belusamy vs. N. Palanisamy 2011
(11) SCC 275; Dharambir vs. CBI 2008 ( 148) DLT 289 and Ashok
Tshering Bhutia
respondent/plaintiff supporting the impugned order submits that in the present case SCC No.77 of 2008 has been ex parte decreed in favour ... following judgments:-
( 1) K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy ( 2011) 11 SCC 275
(2) Rejendra Prasad Gupta Vs. Prakash Chandra Mishra and others ( 2011
Note:
? Cases referred:
1. 2010(6) ALT 92 (DB)
2. (2011) 11 SCC 275
3. LAWS
case of K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy , 2011 (11) SCC 275, it was held as under:
"12................................
(a) Section
Tiwari and Another Vs. State of Uttar
Pradesh and others (2010) 10 SCC 677 and its para 37 to argue that this
court should exercise ... case of K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy (2011) 11
SCC 275 to argue that even at the stage of final arguments, courts can permit
Apex Court on this
aspect in the case reported in (2011) 11 SCC 275 ( K.K.
Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy ). This judgment makes it clear
SCC 410 ( Vadiraj Naggappa Vernekar (dead)
Through LRs Vs. Sharad Chandra Prabhakar Gogate ) and 2011 (11)
SCC 275 ( K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy ). Lastly
case of K.K.
Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy : (2011) 11 SCC 275 held as follows :
"9. Order 18 Rule 17 of the Code enables
subsequent decision, namely,
K.K.Veluswamy v. N.Palanisamy , (2011) 11
SCC 275: (2011 AIR SCW 2296), submitted
that with the aid of Section ... need to interfere with
the same.
xxx xxx xxx
9
11. The perusal of the materials placed by the
plaintiff which are intended
petitioner placed
reliance on the decisions reported in (2011)11 SCC page
275 and 2013 AIR SCW page 1564.
10. As against this, the learned ... Court in K.K.Velusamy Vs.
N. Palanisamy reported in (2011)11 SCC 275 at para.20
has observed as follows:
"If the party
