care and
20 2013 (3) Mh.L.J. 182
21 (2020) 6 SCC 629
22 Civil Appeal No.946 of 2016 - Reported Judgment ... SCC 114
26 (2011) 11 SCC 275
27 (2011) 11 SCC 275
17/44
902-IA-1575-2022.doc
Dixit
when it is absolutely necessary
Jaypee Rewa Cement , (2004) 3 SCC 85 (Para 12); and KK Velusamy v.
N. Palanisamy , (2011) 11 SCC 275, (Para 12).
12
23. The extensive
Code cannot be routinely
18
(1970) 1 SCC 732
Signature Not Verified
19
(2011) 11 SCC 275
Digitally Signed
By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI CS (COMM
parties. The said power is not
13
(2011) 11 SCC 275
Signature Not Verified CM(M) 616/2022 Page 11 of 15
Digitally Signed ... evidence
which could not be produced when the 2 (2011) 11
SCC 275 evidence was being recorded. Order 18 Rule
17 is primarily a provision
holding at
paragraphs- 9 and 10:
2
(2009) 4 SCC 110
3
(2011) 11 SCC 275
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI ... evidence which could
not be produced when the 2 (2011) 11 SCC
275 evidence was being recorded. Order 18 Rule 17 is
primarily a provision
exercise of its powers under Article
227 of the Constitution of India?
11. At the outset, it is to be noted that even ... petitioner/defendants would be required to refer
2
(2011) 11 SCC 275
8
NJS,J
Common Order
Palanisamy 2011(2) RCR
(Civil) 875 : 2011(3) Recent Apex Judgments (R.A.J.) 83
: (2011) 11 SCC 275, the principles enunciated in
Vadiraj (supra
Delhi reported in
(1977) 1 SCC 508
h. K.K.Velusamy Vs. N.Palanisamy reported in (2011) 11
SCC 275.
(Downloaded on 25/11/2022
would not amount to a 'corrupt practice'
E.P. No. 11 ... Brij Mohan and others [( 1983) 4 SCC 36], and K.K. Velusamy vs. N.
Palaanisamy [(2011) 11 SCC 275], is therefore of no avail
when the affidavit evidence was prepared.”
11.In Re K.K.Velusamy v. N.Palanisamy [(2011) 11 SCC 275], the Hon'ble
Supreme Court
