defendant has relied upon
K.K.Velusamy vs. N.Palanisamy (2011) 11 SCC 275 in support of his
contentions.
3. Mr.R.K.Aggarwal, learned ... Sharadchandra Prabhakar
Gogate and ( 2009) 4 SCC 410, K.K.Velusamy vs. N.Palanisamy (2011) 11
SCC 275 (decision in K.K.Velusamy
Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy [K.K. Velusamy v. N.
Palanisamy, (2011) 11 SCC 275 : (2011) 3 SCC (Civ)
665] , submitted that with ... Velusamy case [ K.K.
Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy , (2011) 11 SCC 275:
(2011) 3 SCC (Civ) 665], SCC p. 285, para
Uttar Pradesh & Anr. 2013 (11) SCC 476; State of Karnataka vs. M.
Devendrappa & Anr. 2002 (3) SCC 89; Shri Anur Kumar Jain ... 2010 (D.B.); K. K. Belusamy vs. N. Palanisamy 2011
(11) SCC 275; Dharambir vs. CBI 2008 ( 148) DLT 289 and Ashok
Tshering Bhutia
SCC 401, T. Arivandandam
v. T.V. Satyapal , 1978 SCR (1) 742, K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
( 2011) 11 SCC 275, Bhuneshwar Prasad
Google Inc. & Ors vs Competition Commission Of India & Anr on 27 April, 2015
Singh and Ors. , (2008) 2 SCC 488, paragraph 8
36
K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy , (2011) 11 SCC 275, paragraph 12
37
Manohar ... Bhullar and Ors. , (2011) 14 SCC 770, paragraphs 60 and 64
39
Alka Gupta v. Narender Kumar Gupta , (2010) 10 SCC 141, paragraphs
Cadila Healthcare Limited And Anr vs Competition Commission Of India And Ors on 12 September
Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy , reported as (2011)
11 SCC 275, the Supreme Court has made the following pertinent
observations:
"12. The respondent contended that
Code cannot be routinely
18
(1970) 1 SCC 732
Signature Not Verified
19
(2011) 11 SCC 275
Digitally Signed
By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI CS (COMM
Supreme Court in K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy (2011) 11 SCC 275 as
under:
"12. The respondent contended that Section 151 cannot
