M/S Bagai Construction Tr.Prop vs M/S Gupta Building Material Store on 22 February, 2013
subsequent decision, namely, K.K. Velusamy vs. N. Palanisamy , (2011) 11 SCC
275, submitted that with the aid of Section 151 CPC, the plaintiff
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 265 (0.05 seconds)Central Bureau Of Investigation Thr ... vs Smt Isha Devi & Ors on 10 January, 2013
Supreme Court in K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy (2011) 11 SCC 275 as
under:
"12. The respondent contended that Section 151 cannot
Ravindra Kumar Gupta And 3 Ors. vs Rakesh Kumar Gupta And Another on 5 October, 2013
with Order VII Rule 11 CPC .
( VIII) Shiv Cotex Vs. Tirgun Auto Plast Private Limited and Others ; (2011) 9 SCC 678, particularly paragraphs ... compelling necessity.
( IX) K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy ; (2011) 11 SCC 275, particularly paragraph 12, wherein the Apex Court has held that the power
M/S Rajgopal And Co., vs K N Narasimha Murthy Since Dead By His Lrs on 3 April, 2013
subsequent decision, namely, K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy , (2011)
11 SCC 275 : (2011 AIR SCW 2296), submitted that with the aid of
Section ... there is no need to interfere with
the same.
xxx xxx xxx
11. The perusal of the materials placed by the plaintiff which are
intended
Y.Prabhakara Rao vs 1.P.S. Anil Kumar And Others on 19 July, 2013
2011) 11 SCC 275
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2743 OF 2013
ORDER:
The revision petitioner
Vinod S/O Khimji Lodaya vs Muljibhai S/O Maujibhai Patel on 25 June, 2013
Velusamy V/s V.N.Palanisamy reported in (2011) 11 SCC - 275.
The Supreme Court has taken a view that, in appropriate cases, the Court
A.Lazar vs M.K.Azhagiri on 30 August, 2013
Court in K.K.Veluisamy v. N.Palanisamy , reported in (2011) 11 SCC 275.
10. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel for the parties
The Official Liquidator vs R.Vijayakumar on 1 March, 2013
Supreme Court in Som Mittal v. Govt. of Karnataka [2008(3) SCC 753], deprecated the practice of invoking jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code ... Supreme Court in K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy [2011(11) SCC 275], held that power under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure
K Bhagyamma vs Smt Parvathamma on 27 May, 2013
court
decides in the first instance to hear the appeal under Rule
11 of Order XLI CPC . Thus, in view of the plain language ... decree appealed. In K.K.Velusamy vs. N.Palanisamy ,
(2011) 11 SCC 275, Apex Court after noticing catena of
decisions explaining the scope
S.Bhaskaran vs R.Loganathan (Deceased) on 18 December, 2013
SHARAD CHAND PRABHAKAR GOGATE
[2009 (4) SCC 410]
( v) VELUSAMY V. PALANISAMY
[2011 (11) SCC 275].
13. We have given our anxious consideration ... witness.
25. VADIRAJ NAGGAPPA VERNEKAR (2009 (4) SCC 410) and PALANISAMY (2011 (11) SCC 275) dealt with Order XVIII, Rule 17 C.P.C which