suit, she claims
20 (2004) 12 SCC 278
21 AIR 1962 SC 527
22 (2011) 11 SCC 275
AVK 28/117
::: Uploaded
suit, she claims
20 (2004) 12 SCC 278
21 AIR 1962 SC 527
22 (2011) 11 SCC 275
AVK 28/117
::: Uploaded
Maharashtra, (2014) 16 SCC 623, (6) Dr.
Page No.# 7/25
Faesal & Ors. Vs. Union of India , ( 2020) 4 SCC 1, (7) K. Kamaraja ... following cases, viz., ( 1) K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy , ( 2011) 11 SCC 275 ,
and (2) Jyotsna Rani Ghosh Vs. Garib Sah Nawas
further recapitulated in detail in Ram Rati v. Mange
Ram , (2016) 11 SCC 296, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has
observed the following ... Velusamy [K.K.
Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy , (2011) 11 SCC 275 : (2011) 3
SCC (Civ) 665] , they have been succinctly summarised as
follows under para
Court. In K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy ,
(2011) 11 SCC 275, the Hon'ble Supreme Court summarized the scope
of Section
matter of K.K. Velusamy vs.
N. Palanisamy , reported in ( 2011) 11 SCC 275, Ram Rati vs. Mange Ram
(dead) through Legal Representatives and Others
invoked [ K.K. Veluswamy
Vs. N Palanisamy , reported in (2011) 11 SCC 275].
34. In instant case, it is seen that beneficiary of sale
deed
Ombir Singh & Anr.
V. Jaspali Chauhan & Ors. 2018 SCC OnLine Del 6675; and
Maharaj IS Wahi v. Renuka Wahi, NC No.2016 ... Supreme Court in K.K.Velusamy
v. N.Palanisamy (2011) 11 SCC 275; and this Court in
Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. & Anr. V. Anil
terms as the court may deem fit to
impose.
2
(2011) 11 SCC 275
- 21 -
RP No. 747 of 2022
7.6. By relying
case of K.K. Velusamy vs. N. Palaanisamy (2011) 11 SCC 275
relying upon Vadiraj Naggappa Vernekar (supra) it held that the
said power
