Court CWJC No.2807 of 2016 (2) dt.16-02-2016
10/11
application at this stage cannot be entertained. It may be
mentioned here ... case of K.
K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy 2011 (11) SCC 275 2011 (11)
SCC 275, has held that 'the Court in appropriate cases
abuse of the process of
court gets fortified.
1
(2011) 11 SCC 275
5
6. In K.K. Velusamy (supra), while dealing with the power
Head Note:
? Cases referred:
1.2016(3) ALD 162 (SC)
2.(2011) 11 SCC 275
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION
Hanumantha Reddy
<GIST:
>HEAD NOTE:
? Cases referred
(2011) 11 SCC 275 ... 2011 (6) ALT 299
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
C.R.P.No.1153 of 2017
O R D E R:
Defendants
2011 (4) SCC 240
6. 2010 (4) SCC 329
7. 2011 (11) SCC 275
8. 2016 (3) ALD 162 (SC)
9. (2013) 14 SCC
SCC 410
2.(2013) 14 SCC 1
3.2003 (1) ALD 790
4.2003 (2) ALD 558
5.(2011) 11 SCC 275
Mental
Health & Neuro Sciences v. C. Parameshwara 15
7 (2011) 11 SCC 275
Cases referred:
(2009) 4 SCC 410
2 AIR 1999 Allahabad 14
3 (1984) 2 SCC 354
4 )2011) 11 SCC 275
Prasad Reddy
<GIST:
>HEAD NOTE:
? Cases referred
1.(2011) 11 SCC 275
Nahar Vs. Nilima Mandal
& Ors. AIR 2009 SC 1103 = (2008)17 SCC 491.
7. So far admitting the document in the evidence is
concerned ... Velusamy Vs. N. Palanisamy 2011 (11) SCC 275 has held that
'the Courts have the jurisdiction to reopen the case of any party
