Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Cadila Healthcare Limited And Anr vs Competition Commission Of India And Ors on 12 September

2011) 11 SCC 275 4.2016 (3) ALD 162 (SC) 5.AIR 2001 SC 1158 HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA

about 147 documents and in Admiralty Suit No.11 of 2013 about 900 pages of documentary evidence were in control of Ashish/Pratap Khialani ... Both notices of motion dismissed. (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) 7 2011(11) SCC 275 Shraddha Talekar PS 23/23 ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2018 ::: Downloaded

about 147 documents and in Admiralty Suit No.11 of 2013 about 900 pages of documentary evidence were in control of Ashish/Pratap Khialani ... Both notices of motion dismissed. (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) 7 2011(11) SCC 275 Shraddha Talekar PS 23/23 ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2018 ::: Downloaded

Others . 2. (2006) 3 SCC 312 reported in Kishore Kumar Khaitan and another vs. Praveen Kumar Singh . 3. (2007) 12 SCC 201 reported in Meera ... case of K.K Velusamy vs. N. Palanisamy reported in (2011)11 SCC 275 has elaborately laid down the scope of Section

reserved for pronouncement of judgment, and 1 (2012)2 SCC 196 2 (2011)11 SCC 275 5 therefore, the learned Trial Court Judge could have ... when arguments are heard and judgment is 3 (2011)11 SCC 275 7 reserved. If there is abuse of the process of the court

petitioners also relied on a judgment reported at 2011 (11) SCC 275 ( K. K. Velusamy versus N. Palanisamy ), where the situations for invoking Section

Velusamy vs. N. Palanisamy reported a hy in 2011 (11) SCC 275. Heard on admission and I.A.No.1052/2018. ad Issue notice

para 7 to 11 held as under: 13 "7. In K.K. Velusamy ((2011) 11 SCC 275), while dealing with the power

been examined and has OWP No.1603/2018 Page 11 of 18 denied this aspect of matter; but he was not confronted with his signature ... orders, which counsel for petitioners have assailed. 21. In AIR 2011 (11) SCC 275 in case titled K.K. Velusamy Vs. N. Palaanisamy