group but the said land is still in possession of MLJ group
('Corporate Applicant'). The said Company has a huge property ... leased out behind their back by one Smt. Ekta Jain
of the MLJ Group to the Applicant of the proceeding namely Sri Munisuvrata
concerned, it has been held repeatedly and has now become well
settled law that the power to review is not an inherent power ... Anantharaju
Shetty v. Appu Hegade ', 37 MLJ 162".
Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Insolvency)No.06 of 2021
10
Respondent
Limited V. State of Karnataka & Other , reported in [2020
(1) MLJ 65 = CDJ 2019 SC 1351], wherein, at Paragraph
Association for Protection of Education' (1990) 2 MLJ 404.
o 'Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.' Vs. 'Cyrus Investments
Association for Protection of Education' (1990) 2 MLJ 404.
o 'Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.' Vs. 'Cyrus Investments
Association for Protection of Education' (1990) 2 MLJ 404.
o 'Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.' Vs. 'Cyrus Investments
Order'
and `rehearing of matter' is impermissible in `Law'.
60. A `Debatable' and `Legal' issues are not covered ... Datta AIR 1996 Cal 4.
62. In reality, if a `Court of Law', decides a question erroneously, it is no
ground for `Review
case of SVT Spinning Mills Ltd. vs. M. Palanisami (2009) 6 MLJ
821.
T.A. No. 19/ 2021 (Company Appeal
Myotic Trading Private Limited vs Deepak Maini Resolution Professional ... on 25 July, 2025
NATIONAL COMPANY
Myotic Trading Private Limited vs Deepak Maini Resolution Professional ... on 25 July, 2025
NATIONAL COMPANY
