Sukumaran v. State of Tamil Nadu [2012 (5) MLJ 670], W.A.
No.92 & 93 of 2018 judgment dated ... Ravichandran v. State
of Tamil Nadu and others reported in (2013) 7 MLJ
641, has settled the issue. It is relevant to extract
Sukumaran v. State of Tamil Nadu [2012 (5) MLJ 670], W.A.
No.92 & 93 of 2018 judgment dated ... Ravichandran v. State
of Tamil Nadu and others reported in (2013) 7 MLJ
http://www.judis.nic.in
641, has settled the issue
law after the conclusive verdict of the Supreme Court in Sardar Khan and Ors. vs. Syed Najmul Hasan (Seth) and Others , [(2007)3 MLJ ... Appanna Poricha Vs Narasinga Poricha and others [1921(XLI) MLJ 608: AIR 1922 Madras 17 (FB)], Thirumalai Tirupati Devasthanams Committee Vs Udiavar Krishnayya
Inspector of Police,
Veppur Police Station, Cuddalore District (2016) 1 MLJ (Crl) 483.
17. The learned counsel for the first respondent would further ... Ganesan vs. State rep.by Deputy
Superintendent of Police, Namakkal (2017) I MLJ (Crl.) 558 and Ekambaram vs.
State by Inspector of Police
case of P.V.Subramanian v. Secretary to Government , 2014 (5) MLJ 129, has held that licence can be converted into ... Subramanian Vs. Secretary to Government , reported in 2014 (5) MLJ 129 has concluded that the Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, 1st respondent herein
Service Act, 2016, shall not be applicable to Law Graduates, who have
joined law course, prior to 14.09.2008, for applying to the post ... admitted to law course. While, considering
the two conflicting judgments in S.R.Deepak v. Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar
Law University and another reported
Kumar Chopra v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) (x)(2011) 3 MLJ (Crl) 317 ( Jayarama Reddiar v. Station House Officer, Gingee Police ... Station ) and (xi)(2011) 1 MLJ (Crl) 345 ( Sigamani and another v. State represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, CC Wing, Coimbatore
Chinnasamy and Others v. RDO, Trichy,
reported in 2015(3) MLJ (Crl) 710;
(c) R.Kasthuri v. State by the District Collector,
Cuddalore ... others, reported in 2015(1) MLJ
(crl)455.
➢ It is the case of the prosecution that P.W.1 had taken
the deceased
Service Act, 2016, shall not be applicable to the Law Graduates, who have
joined law course, prior to 14.09.2008, for applying the post ... admitted to law course. While, considering
the two conflicting judgments in S.R.Deepak v. Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar
Law University and Another reported
variance with his pleading. ... It cannot be disputed that courts of law have the power to grant decrees which would be warranted by the facts ... parties.
13.Hadi, J. in Rajeswari Vs. Dhanammal , 1994 (1) MLJ 401 has referred to this principle and followed the same
