observed as
under:-
"6. Now it is settled law that no public interest litigation is
maintainable with regard to service matter. This was brought ... case of Seema Dhamdhere v. State of Maharashtra reported in
2008 (1) MLJ 489 (SC), while reiterating earlier decision, the Supreme Court
observed
Jaffer Sharief V. State (Through CBI ), reported in (2013) 1 MLJ (Crl) 90 (SC), it is observed that the appellant was the Head ... evidence and makes a departure from the established principles of criminal law on the question of burden of proof by raising a presumption of guilt
Nagarasu vs S.Venkatesan [2014(5)Mlj 769 on 1 February, 2016
Author: M.Venugopal
Bench: Satish K.Agnihotri , M.Venugopal ... CHAIRMAN, TNEB AND ANOTHER VS. S.VENKATESAN [2014(5)MLJ 769], after analysing all the judgments on this point, refused to interfere with
well-settled principle of law that non-mentioning or wrong mentioning
of provision of law would not be of any relevance, if the court ... decisions in Kalyani Baskar V.
M.S.Sampoornam (2007) 1 MLJ (Crl) 1020 case and T.Nagappa V. Y.R.Mudaliar
Bench of this Court in the decision reported in (1995) 2 MLJ 458 ( V. Chandran v. Oil Selection Board ).
14. Admittedly no male
Petitioner/Accused takes a plea
that in case of summary procedure, where law provides for adjudication of
case in the absence of an accused ... Police, All Women Police Station, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli
District) reported in 2001 MLJ (Crl.) 563, Special Page 566 at paragraph
respondents take appropriate action for eviction in the manner known to law, the petitioner is certainly entitled for the ELECTRICITY CONNECTION, which forms part ... Tondiarpet Village, Chennai, however, subject to various conditions imposed in accordance with law. It is made clear that conferment of ELECTRICITY CONNECTION with
Nadu Electricity Board, Thiruchendur V. S.J.Gayas and others, (2008) 2 MLJ 812, and at special page 813, whereby and whereunder ... evidence which has been overlooked, or procedural illegality or manifest error in law, the High Court should not interfere. Similar view has been taken
petitioner the delay need not be condoned. It is settled law that the appellant has to satisfy that the delay was due to sufficient cause ... decision Sivakumar and Another V. R.Sengodan ((2007) 5 MLJ 718), it is held as follows:-
In a case of condonation of delay
State of Tamil Nadu and others V. A.Gurusamy , 1997 (2) MLJ 49 (Supreme Court), it is held that 'No question ... Steel Co., Ltd., V. Union of India and others , (2001) 1 MLJ 133 (Supreme Court), it is held that 'There must
