appropriate multiplier is 18.
44. In the judgment reported in 2013 ACJ 1403
(Rajesh and others Vs. Rajbir Singh), the Apex Court held
that, even ... dependency.
47. The Apex Court, in the case reported in 2013
ACJ 5800 (Sanobanu Nazirbhai Mirza Vs. Ahmedbad
Municipal Transport Service) and also
Sita Gupta and others 2009 ACJ 437 and Harkhu Bai and
others V/s Jiyaram and others 2005 ACJ 1332 in support
of his arguments ... Court reported in (Rajesh and others Vs. Rajbeer
Singh and others) 2013 ACJ 1403. If 50% is added to the
income of the petitioner
ACJ 911 between Ravi Vs.
Badrinarayan and others .
6) 2013 ACJ 679 between S. Ramana Vs. T.
Venkateswarlu and another .
7) 2013 ACJ 258 between ... noted that as per the ruling of 2013 ACJ
1403 ( Rajesh and others vs Rajbir Singh ), the Hon'ble
Apex Court discussed the ruling
relied
upon the following judgments:
1) 2007 ACJ 721 SC
2) 2010 ACJ 709 SC
3) 2013 ACJ 2129 SC
9 MVC No.2682/2014 ... bright and
meritorious in studies.
30. In a case reported in 2013 ACJ 2498 ( Om Prakash
Gupta and others Vs. Wajeer Ahmed Ali Nayak Wadi
enhanced to Rupees 11,20,528/- (2009 ACJ
1298(SC) and 2013 ACJ 1403 (SC) followed.
Quantum- Interest-Allowed at the rate of 9
percent ... from the
owner (2004 ACJ 2094 (SC), 2013 ACJ 1008
(HP), 2008 ACJ 574 (HP) and 2013 ACJ 2785
(HP) followed).
vi) 2014 ACJ
relied upon the
following judgments:
1) 2015 ACJ 921
2) 2013 ACJ 2416
3) 2012 ACJ 1307
4) 2015 ACJ 1424
14. The Counsel ... view of
the principles liad down in the judgment reported in 2013
ACJ 1403 ( Rajesh Vs. Rajbir Singh ), the Apex Court held that even
deceased-
Award of the MACT is justified.
Appeal is dismissed.
iv) 2013 ACJ 1403 Supreme Court of India at New
Delhi (Rajesh and Others ... Sarla
Verma 2009 ACJ 1298 (SC) and affirmed in
Reshma Kumari, 2013 ACJ 1253 (SC)
should be applied.
Quantum-Fatal accident -Deceased
aged 48, employed
Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the
following Judgment:
1) 2013 ACJ 2118
13. The Counsel for the respondent No.1 has relied
upon ... relied
upon the following Judgments:
1) 2007 ACJ 721 SC
2) 2010 ACJ 709 SC
3) 2013 ACJ 2128 SC
4) 2007 ACJ
reported in Rajesh and
others V/s Rajbir Singh and others, 2013 ACJ 1403, I hold
that, petitioners are entitled for compensation ... reported in Rajesh and others V/s Rajbir
Singh and others 2013 ACJ 1403. Hence, the petitioner No.1 is
awarded the compensation
Ashakumari R. has placed
reliance upon the decisions reported in,
i) 2013 ACJ 1633 High Court of Andhra Pradesh
at Hyderabad ... facts and
evidence of the case-Held: yes.
ii) 2013 ACJ 1964 High Court of Judicature at
Madras (United India Insurance Company