K.P.M. Aboobucker vs K. Kunhamoo And Ors. on 20 December, 1957
MADRAS 287, (1958) 1 MADLJ303, ILR (1958) MAD 720, 1971 MADLW 211
JUDGMENT
P. Rajagopalan, O.C.J.
1. This is an appeal against
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 7548 (1.45 seconds)The Public Prosecutor vs Ratnavelu Chetty on 24 February, 1926
Salem. The accused was committed to the Court of Session under Section 211 , Indian Penal Code. The Assistant Sessions Judge held that the proceedings were ... Magistrate had jurisdiction to take cognizance of an offence under Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code disclosed therein. The learned Judges followed the decision
T. Sitharam Chetty And Thotta V. ... vs Sir S. Subramania Aiyer And Ors. on 19 November, 1915
Subramania Aiyer And Ors. on 19 November, 1915
Equivalent citations: 32IND. CAS.211, AIR 1917 MADRAS 551
JUDGMENT
John Wallis, C.J.
1. These
Row Venkata Kumara Mahipati Surya Row ... vs Gani Venkat Subba Row And Ors. And ... on 1 April, 1915
Limitation Act owing to the minority of the plaintiff. Sections 210 and 211 enact rules of limitation for suits under the Act, and Section 211 ... plaintiff's vested right of suit, unless the provisions of Section 211(1) be read subject to an implied exception in cases where these
The Sessions Judge Of The Tinnevelly ... vs Sivan Chetty on 3 February, 1909
complaint of dacoity has been proceeded against for an offence under Section 211 , Indian Penal Code, and has been committed to the Sessions. The question ... facts alleged against him amount in law to an offence under Section 211 , Indian Penal Code. The matter is by no means free from difficulty
A.S.Subramani vs The Deputy Registrar Of Cooperative ... on 27 July, 2006
Cooperative ... on 27 July, 2006
Equivalent citations: 2007 LAB. I. C. 211, (2006) 47 ALLINDCAS 690 (MAD), 2006 (6) AIR KANT
C.K. Ranganathan vs Registrar Of Companies on 19 December, 2001
proceedings in the case.
2. The respondent filed a complaint under Section 211(7) of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') against ... correct. The offence complained of under Section 211(7) of the Act is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months
Rajah Sahib Meharban-I-Doston Sri Raja ... vs G. Venkata Subba Row And Five Ors. on 1 April, 1915
Limitation Act owing to the minority of the plaintiff. Sections 210 and 211 enact rules of limitation for suits under the Act, and Section 211 ... plaintiff's vested right of suit, unless the provisions of Section 211(1) be read subject to an implied exception in cases where these
Chinnammal And 8 Others vs Elumalai And 4 Others on 14 January, 2000
HINDULR 211, (2001) 1 MARRILJ 492, (2000) 2 MAD LW 782, (2000) MATLR 469
ORDER
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of learned
Devasahayam vs Devamony And Anr. on 16 October, 1922
October, 1922
Equivalent citations: (1922)43MLJ763, AIR 1923 MADRAS 211
JUDGMENT
Krishnan, J.
1. This is an appeal from the decree of the District Judge