Section 223 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 223 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
223. Escape from confinement or custody negligently suffered by public servant.—
Whoever, being a public servant legally
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 8932 (2.04 seconds)State vs Rajesh Kumar Sharma on 27 June, 2025
Inder Pal
4) Ct. Rajbir (Abated)
e) Offence complained of : Section 223 IPC
f) Offence charged of : Section 223 IPC ... Proceedings
2. After completion of the investigation, charge-sheet under sections 223 IPC was
filed before the court against the accused persons
State vs . : Tinku Rai Etc on 29 January, 2008
Narayan s/o
6 Offence complained of or : 223/224/34 IPC
proved
7 Plea of the accused : Pleaded not guilty
8 Date ... with both.
In order to establish the charge under S.223 , I.P.C. the following
facts have to be established : -
(i) The accused
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... vs Constable 1278 Krishan Dutt Mishra on 12 September, 2024
record.
2. By means of the present application under Section 378 (3) Cr.P.C. / 419(3) B.N.S.S., the State has sought ... Cr.P.C. He also visited the place of occurrence. Upon conclusion of investigation, he submitted charge sheet against the respondent under Section 223
C. Satnam Singh vs State Of Punjab on 6 February, 2019
appellant herein was convicted under Sections
379 and 411 Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to
rigorous imprisonment for one year ... applicability of Section 360 of the Criminal
Procedure Code. Section 361 and Section 360 of the Code
on being read together would indicate that
Jagtar Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab on 4 April, 2011
undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period
of six months under Section 203 IPC;
(ii) to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period
of three ... relevant documents and recorded the statements of witnesses under Section
161 Cr.P.C. The prosecution of the accused was sanctioned by the SSP,
Bathinda
Raj Singh vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 22 January, 2013
IPC. While offence u/s 224 IPC was against the accused, the office u/s 223 / 224 IPC ... dated 14/1/08 u/s 307 / 34 IPC PS Palam Village Delhi. The IO SI Rajesh Shukla had taken
Ram Kumar vs The State on 20 November, 2017
executed the process u/s. 83 Cr.P.C against accused
Arvind and process u/s. 83 Cr.P.C is proved ... Section 155(2) Cr.P.C.
In the present case the chargesheet was filed u/s. 223 / 224
IPC and Section
State vs . (1). Ajay @ Gadhaiya on 13 December, 2014
well as relevant documents.
14. After compliance of section 207 Cr.P.C., the case was committed
to the Court of Sessions and was assigned ... Ajay had already been examined during trial.
19. Thereafter, statements U/s 313 Cr.P.C . of both the accused
persons namely Bharat @ Vijay and Ajay
State vs . Hc Ajab Singh & Ors. on 10 October, 2013
This witness has deposed
regarding execution of process u/s 82 / 83 Cr.P.C. against the accused Sanjay
Sharma @ Sanju @ Lambu.
D. Inspector Inder ... This witness has
deposed that he executed process u/s 82 / 83 Cr.P.C. against the accused Sanjay
@ Sanju and accused Sanjay @ Sanju