retrenchment compensation or notice pay
as required under the provisions of Sections 25F and 25G of the
Industrial Disputes Act,1947 (for short ... complaint and since there was non-
compliance with the provisions of Section 25F of the ID Act, the
termination of the complainant was illegal
This Special Civil Application raises a short and interesting question under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The facts of the ease ... notice on August 31, 1954, purporting to be a notice under Section 25F of the Act, informing the petitioner that the respondent company desired
their services have been terminated in breach of the provisions of Section 25F and 25G of the ID Act thereby committing unfair labour practices under ... them by the management.
BREACH OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 25F OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT
SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE MANAGEMENT
Railway Company and therefore they were entitled to compensation under Section 25F , Industrial Disputes Act. The Authority held on merits in favour of the employees ... merits is that no compensation is payable to the workmen under Section 25F of the Act, Mr. Palkhivala rightly points out that if we hold
payment offered. A notice to the Government, as required under section 25F(c) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ... compensation was less than what ought to have been offered under section 25F(b) of the I.D. Act relying on the Judgment of this
petitioner's service amounted to retrenchment attracting the provisions of S. 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, and that the Bank not having complied ... Bank had failed to pay the retrenchment compensation in breach of S. 25F(b) of the Act, the petitioner was entitled to reinstatement with continuity
Labour Court has held that since there has been compliance of Section 25F, their termination from service was legal.
2. The petitioner Union represents ... Union contended that there was illegal retrenchment as the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred
illegal and improper on the grounds that there was violation of Section 25F and Section 25G of the Act as on retrenchment compensation was tendered ... retrenchment. According to the Petitioner, there was no violation of either Section 25F and/or Section 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. There were
retrenchment compensation, as required respectively under Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred ... question as to whether there was contravention of the provisions of section 25F and section 25G of the Act. After having carefully appraised the evidence
railway company and therefore they were entitled to compensation under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act. The authority held on merits in favour ... merits is that no compensation is payable to the workmen under Section 25F of the Act, Mr. Palkhivala rightly points out that if we bold
