till they were verbally terminated from service;
the management has violated Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947, in short ... 3517/2023 & Batch
there is non-compliance of Section 25F of the Act; that, as the workmen have worked
only for a shorter duration
failing which, it can presumed that there is a violation
of Section 25F of I.D.Act.
7. According to the learned counsel ... judis.nic.in
W.P.No.17224 of 2017
“25F – Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen- No
workman employed in any industry who has been
granted.
5. In this case, the employer Management has violated Section 25F of the
Act. Even in case of irregular employment, if an employee works ... retrenchment compensation
has to be paid. For the sake of convenience, Section 25F (b) of the Act is extracted
below :
''25F. Conditions precedent
continuous employment.
5. For the sake of convenience, Sections 25B and 25F of the Industrial
Disputes Act,1947, in short ... hundred and twenty days, in any
other case.''
''25F. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.- No
workman employed in any industry
that, when there is non-compliance of
the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the
employees would be entitled to reinstatement ... contemplated under
Section 25B of the Act, non-compliance of Section 25F vitiates the order of
termination and non-employment was held
Supreme Court in the
said case had considered whether Section 25F of the I.D.Act can be canvassed
under the provisions of the Shops
even a daily rated worker would be entitled to protection of Section
25F of the Act if he had continuously worked for a period
even a daily rated worker would be entitled to protection of
Section 25F of the Act if he had continuously worked for a period
mine; and (ii)
one hundred and twenty days, in any other case.
25F. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen.—No workman
employed in any industry ... without any notice or notice pay in view of
provisions of Section 25F of Industrial Dispute Act. If the present case on hand is
tested
even a daily rated worker would be entitled to protection of
Section 25F of the Act if he had continuously worked for a period
