illegal and unjustified and was in violation
of Section 25G and 25H of the I. D. Act, and directed reinstatement of the
Workman along with ... reasons to be
recorded the employer retrenches any other workman.
Section 25H of the ID Act
W.P.(C.) No.472/2023 Page
employer (present petitioner) in breach of
Section 25F , 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter
referred to as the Act) refused ... have been any occasion for violation of provisions of
Sections 25G and 25H of the Act. The respondent-claimant had not
completed 160 days
period 04.07.2019 to
06.09.2019, in violation of Section 25F & 25H of Industrial Disputes
Act.
1.1 Thereafter, he sent a Demand Notice dated ... without payment of earned wages, in
violation of Section 25F and 25H of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
11.2 The management disputed the relationship of employer
respondents have correctly submitted that the provisions of Sections 25G and 25H of the Act do not require that the workman should have been ... basis that there had been a violation of Sections 25G and 25H of the Act, but, the same by itself, in our opinion, would
retrenchment was
accordingly made, which did not amount to violation
of section 25H . In that regard, in course of the
hearing, he produced a typed ... except
branding the workmen with different nomenclatures.
5.4 About breach of section 25H of the Act,
learned Single was justified in drawing conclusion
from
termination was in breach of
sections 25F as well as 25G and 25H of the Industrial
Disputes Act.
3.1 On the other hand ... recorded by the Labour Court that there
was breach of Section 25H and 25G of the Act. These
provisions are mandatory in nature. Resultantly
that there was violation of
provisions of Sections 33 , 25F , 25G and 25H of the ID Act and
that the respondent workmen were entitled ... Nagarpalika and therefore, there
was violation of provisions of Section 25G and 25H of the ID Act
Page 5 of 8
Downloaded
Labour Court examined the threadbare
provisions of Sections 25F , 25G and 25H of the Act and has correctly
applied to the facts of the case ... conclusion that there
was no breach of Sections 25F , 25G and 25H of the Act as the petitioner
failed to establishment employment or engagement
submits that the
reference was made under Sections 25F , 25G and
25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [" ID
Act " for short ... learned Labour
Court has held that there is a breach of Section
25H of the ID Act and in lieu of the
reinstatement, since
submitted
that there is a clear violation of
sections 25F , 25G and 25H of the
Industrial Disputes Act,1947 [for short ... conclusion that
there is no breach of section 25F , 25G
and 25H of the Act without there being any
contrary evidence available on record
