work for 8 hrs. The breach of Section 25F , 25G and
25H of the Industrial Disputes Act was alleged.
4.1 In the second case ... termination of his
service, breach of Section 25F , 25G and 25H of the
Industrial Disputes Act was alleged.
3.2 In both the cases, the first
violation of the
mandatory provisions of Sections 25F , 25G and 25H of the Act, the
workman approached the Tribunal, by filing his claim statement under ... petitioner/management has violated the
mandatory provisions of Sections 25F , 25G and 25H of the Act, while
terminating the services of the workman. The observations
ORDER:
The petitioners seeking direction to the respondents to comply with
Section 25H of the Industrial Dispute Act.
Section 25H reads as follows:
25H ... directions to the respondents to comply with the provisions of the Section 25H .
3. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that in the year
ORDER:
The petitioners seeking direction to the respondents to comply with
Section 25H of the Industrial Dispute Act.
Section 25H reads as follows:
25H ... directions to the respondents to comply with the provisions of the Section 25H .
3. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that
ORDER:
The petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to comply with
Section 25H of the Industrial Dispute Act.
Section 25H reads as follows:
25H ... directions to
the respondents to comply with the provisions of the Section 25H .
3. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that in the year
from the retrenches
and the management has violated the provisions of
Section 25H of the Act.
Regarding this, the argument of the
management is that ... BBMB are made as per
provisions of the relevant regulations and Section
25H of the Act does not give any legal right to the
retrenchees
management did not comply with the provisions of Section
25F , 25G and 25H of I.D. Act, as no notice, notice pay or service
compensation ... days of continuous service for the
purpose of 25F, 25G and 25H of I.D. Act, therefore, no question of
illegal termination arises
also failed to porve violation of provisions of
Section 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 by the
management.
17. It is further ... violation by the management, of the
provisions of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is
concerned, the workman has failed to prove that
that in case of breach of
statutory provisions viz. Section 25F ,
25G , 25H of the Act, 1947, ordinarily as
a consequence of such a breach ... were not called back.
6.4. It was submitted that as per Section
25H of the Act which provides that when
any workmen are retrenched
petitioner, the respondent/establishment did
not comply with provisions of sections 25F , 25H , 25G and 25N of
4
the ID Act, 1947 . The termination ... under the provisions
of Sections 25F clauses (a) and (b), 25G and
25H of the Act read with Rules 77 and 78 of the
relevant
