basis of the un-reconciled transactions appearing in Form No. 26AS and
the books of accounts:
3:1 The NFAC/ CIT(A) has erred ... being the alleged difference between the professional fees
appearing in Form No. 26AS and the books of accounts.
3:2 The Appellant submits that considering
books of accounts and those shown in the TDS form 26AS in
as much as the ld. Firstappellate authority was having no jurisdiction ... accounts which were not even
rejected and those shown in TDS form 26AS could not be taken in cognizance by
considering such difference as income
basis of the un-reconciled transactions appearing in Form No. 26AS and
the books of accounts:
3:1 The NFAC/ CIT(A) has erred ... being the alleged difference between the professional fees
appearing in Form No. 26AS and the books of accounts.
3:2 The Appellant submits that considering
accounts, copy of
license f ee/stock regis ter, For m No. 26AS and co mputation
of inco me. T hus, it was conten ... Bank
State men ts, S tock regis ter and For m No. 26AS. When these
details were avail able
appearing in the return of income and as reflected in Form 26AS.
3. That, the Ld. Pr. C.I.T. has acted against the Explanation ... alleged
discrepancy in receipts between the return of income and Form 26AS.
5. That, the appellant craves leave to amend, alter, modify, substitute
made on the
basis of the un- reconciled transactions appearing in Form 26AS and the
books of accounts:
1.1 The NFAC/ CIT(A) has erred ... fees being the alleged difference between the
professional fees appearing in Form 26AS and the books of accounts.
1.2 The Assessee submits that considering
made on the
basis of the un- reconciled transactions appearing in Form 26AS and the
books of accounts:
1.1 The NFAC/ CIT(A) has erred ... fees being the alleged difference between the
professional fees appearing in Form 26AS and the books of accounts.
1.2 The Assessee submits that considering
made on the
basis of the un- reconciled transactions appearing in Form 26AS and the
books of accounts:
1.1 The NFAC/ CIT(A) has erred ... fees being the alleged difference between the
professional fees appearing in Form 26AS and the books of accounts.
1.2 The Assessee submits that considering
made on
account of difference in contract receipt shown in Form 26AS vis-à-vis
receipts accounted by the assessee.
2. On the facts
addition of Rs. 2,88,304/-, due to mismatch in Form 26AS, which
was not relating to the assessee and has later been reversed. Hence ... Kota, which was rectified by the UIT and also reversed in Form
26AS of the appellant.
6.2. As mentioned above, during the pendency
