Section 448 in The Income Tax Act, 2025 [Entire Act]
deduct or pay or ensure payment of, as aforesaid. [ Similar to Section 271C from The Income Tax Act, 1961 - Also Refer
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 561 (1.28 seconds)Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd vs Duckback Information Systems Pvt. Ltd. ... on 28 January, 2025
whether such an assessee is liable to pay
penalty under Section 271C of the Act, 1961?
7.2 The question which is also posed ... scope of the words
"fails to deduct" occurring in Section 271C(1)(a) and whether
an assessee who caused delay in remittance
Xcellon Education Limited,,Ahmedabad vs Addl. Cit, Tds,, Ahmedabad on 7 March, 2025
relating to levy of penalty under section 272A(2)(g)
and section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short ... 2017
pertains to the issue of levy of penalty under section 271C of the Act
ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals
Xcellon Education Limited,,Ahmedabad vs Addl. Cit, Tds,, Ahmedabad on 7 March, 2025
relating to levy of penalty under section 272A(2)(g)
and section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short ... 2017
pertains to the issue of levy of penalty under section 271C of the Act
ITA No.2678 to 2681/Ahd/2017 (4 Appeals
M/S Kunj Power Projects ... vs Addl.Cit(Tds) , Kanpur, Kanpur on 16 April, 2025
justified in sustaining the penalty of Rs.
1462179/- levied U/s 271C by the Addl. CIT(TDS) Kanpur vide order
dated 14/09/2021 bearing ... appreciate the claim of the appellant that the
provisions of section 271C are not attracted in the instant case of the
appellant.
7) That
M/S. Bharat Coking Coal ... vs Jcit Tds, Dhanbad on 29 April, 2025
issue of Notice Dtd. 28.02.2018
and the order passed u/s 271C Dtd. 01.05.2018 are barred by limitation. In
case where no specific limitation period ... baseless and uncalled
for. As such, the order passed U/s 271C imposing penalty and confirmed
M/S. Bharat Coking Coal ... vs Jt. Cit, Tds,, Dhanbad on 29 April, 2025
issue of Notice Dtd. 28.02.2018
and the order passed u/s 271C Dtd. 01.05.2018 are barred by limitation. In
case where no specific limitation period ... baseless and uncalled
for. As such, the order passed U/s 271C imposing penalty and confirmed
M/S. Bharat Coking Coal ... vs Jcit, Tds Circle,, Dhanbad on 29 April, 2025
issue of Notice Dtd. 28.02.2018
and the order passed u/s 271C Dtd. 01.05.2018 are barred by limitation. In
case where no specific limitation period ... baseless and uncalled
for. As such, the order passed U/s 271C imposing penalty and confirmed
State Bank Of India ,Mumbai vs Addl.Cit-Tds,Range2(2), Mumbai on 4 February, 2025
erred in levying penalty of Rs. 48,600/- under section 271C of the Act.
ii. On the facts ... confirming penalty
order passed by the Ld. AO imposing penalty under section 271C of the
Act.
iii. On the facts
Branch Manager State Bank Of India, ... vs Acit (Tds), Kanpur on 24 April, 2025
order passed u/s 250 r. w. s 271C of the Act dated
10/06/2024 dismissing the appeal filed by the Appellant and
confirming ... Additional Commissioner of
Income Tax (TDS) dated 19-09-2023 U/s 271C of the Act is bad
in law and void ab initio, since