default for financial year 2007-08, had issued notice
under section 285BA(5) of the Act on 17.12.2008 for that year, the
petitioner had ignored ... default for financial year
2007-08, issued notice under section 285BA (5) of the Act on
17.12.2008 in relation to that year. However, despite
default for financial year 2007-08, had issued notice
under section 285BA(5) of the Act on 17.12.2008 for that year, the
petitioner had ignored ... default for financial year
2007-08, issued notice under section 285BA (5) of the Act on
17.12.2008 in relation to that year. However, despite
default for financial year 2007-08, had issued notice
under section 285BA(5) of the Act on 17.12.2008 for that year, the
petitioner had ignored ... requirement.
The Department after noticing the default, issued notice under
section 285BA (5) of the Act on 17.12.2008 in relation to the year
under consideration
default should be counted from the notice issued u/s 285BA(5)
in September, 2010 as the department itself was sleeping over
the matter ... financial year in which the
transaction is registered or recorded. Section 285BA(5) is reproduced
for the sake of clarity as under:
Section 285BA(5
default should be counted from the notice issued u/s 285BA(5)
in September, 2010 as the department itself was sleeping over
the matter ... financial year in which the
transaction is registered or recorded. Section 285BA(5) is reproduced
for the sake of clarity as under:
Section 285BA(5
default should be counted from the notice issued u/s 285BA(5)
in September, 2010 as the department itself was sleeping over
the matter ... financial year in which the
transaction is registered or recorded. Section 285BA(5) is reproduced
for the sake of clarity as under:
Section 285BA(5
default should be counted from the notice issued u/s 285BA(5)
in September, 2010 as the department itself was sleeping over
the matter ... financial year in which the
transaction is registered or recorded. Section 285BA(5) is reproduced
for the sake of clarity as under:
Section 285BA(5
default should be counted from the notice issued u/s 285BA(5)
in September, 2010 as the department itself was sleeping over
the matter ... financial year in which the
transaction is registered or recorded. Section 285BA(5) is reproduced
for the sake of clarity as under:
Section 285BA(5
default should be counted from the notice issued u/s 285BA(5)
in September, 2010 as the department itself was sleeping over
the matter ... financial year in which the
transaction is registered or recorded. Section 285BA(5) is reproduced
for the sake of clarity as under:
Section 285BA(5
default should be counted from the notice issued u/s 285BA(5)
in September, 2010 as the department itself was sleeping over
the matter ... financial year in which the
transaction is registered or recorded. Section 285BA(5) is reproduced
for the sake of clarity as under:
Section 285BA(5
