Abdul Muttalvi vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 21 June, 2021
offence under Sections 188 , 288 , 268 , 290 , 291 , 447 , 448 , 469 of I.P.C., P.S.- Gwaltoli, District- Kanpur City.
Learned counsel
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 76 (1.15 seconds)Vimlesh Kumar Trivedi vs State Of U.P. & Anr. on 16 July, 2019
Cr.P.C. for grant of bail, arising out of Crime No. 291/2016 under Sections 419 , 420 , 467 , 471 , 504 , 506 of IPC
Ram Shanker And Others vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 24 September, 2019
appellant under Section 302 IPC and instead convicted him under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment ... therefore, convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC instead of Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment
Rameshvar & Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 July, 2017
Sakti
in S.T. No.291/05 convicting the accused/appellants under Section 302 / 34
of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC
Ramesh vs State Of U.P. on 27 November, 2018
appellant under Section 302 IPC and instead convicted him under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment ... therefore, convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC instead of Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment
State Of U.P. vs Rustam And 5 Ors. on 6 January, 2020
Sessions Trial No.290 of 2011 ( State Vs. Firoz ), Sessions Trial No.291 of 2011 ( State Vs. Hamid ) and Sessions Trial ... respondents of the offences under Sections 395 , 397 & 412 of IPC, acquitting respondents Rustam, Firoz, Hamid under Section 25 of the Arms
Smt. Vidya Devi vs State Of U.P. on 14 March, 2019
State (2005) 9 SCC 113 held: ( Balbir Singh case, SCC p. 291, para 34)
'34. We are of the opinion that whereas the findings ... conviction and sentence of both the appellants under Section 498-A IPC.' "
24. In Samadhan Khudaka Koli v. State of Maharashtra5
Smt. Sanjay Devi vs State Of U.P. on 13 December, 2019
State (2005) 9 SCC 113 held: ( Balbir Singh case, SCC p. 291, para 34)
'34. We are of the opinion that whereas the findings ... conviction and sentence of both the appellants under Section 498-A IPC.' "
18. In Samadhan Khudaka Koli v. State of Maharashtra5
Surendra Singh vs State Of U.P. on 2 November, 2018
State 2005 9 SCC 113 held: ( Balbir Singh case, SCC p. 291, para 34)
''34. We are of the opinion that whereas ... conviction and sentence of both the appellants under Section 498-A IPC.' "
33. In the matter of Samadhan Khudaka Koli Vs. State
Tilak Kumar Nayak vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 8 November, 2017
State 2005 9 SCC 113 held: ( Balbir Singh case,
SCC p. 291, para 34)
'34. We are of the opinion that whereas the
findings ... conviction
and sentence of both the appellants under
Section 498-A IPC.' "
19. In the matter of Samadhan Khudaka Koli (supra