Section 292 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 292 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
292. Sale, etc., of obscene books, etc.—
(1) For the purposes of sub-section (2), a book
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 7253 (1.80 seconds)Sharat Babu Digumarti vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 14 December, 2016
offences punishable under Sections 292
and 294 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) and Section 67 of the
Information Technology ... medical text would certainly
be considered to be obscene. Section 292 , Indian Penal Code deals with
obscenity in this sense and cannot thus be said
Ranjit D. Udeshi vs State Of Maharashtra on 19 August, 1964
Chatterley's Lover". He was convicted
under s. 292, Indian Penal Code . In his appeal to the
Supreme Court he contended that ... word "obscene" in s. 292 , Indian Penal Code.
The Indian Penal Code borrowed the word from the English
Statute. As the word
Raj Kapoor vs Laxman on 14 December, 1979
I.P.C. notwithstanding. The absolution is based upon the combined operation of Section 5A of the Act and Section 79 of the Penal Code ... consider, before certification, all the points Section 292 I.P.C. prescribes. Indeed, neither the Penal Code nor the Cinematograph Act can go beyond
Samaresh Bose And Anr vs Amal Mitra And Anr on 24 September, 1985
committed an offence punishable under . 292
Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.- for short) and under S. 292 read
with S. 109 ... word
'obscene' in 8. 292, Indian Penal Code .
The Indian Penal Code borrowed the word from the
English Statute. As the word
Devidas Ramachandra Tuljapurkar vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 14 May, 2015
likely to come within the perceived ambit and
sweep of Section 292 IPC, whether it is permissible. We shall dwell upon
this facet ... investigation charge sheet was filed for the said offences along with 292,
IPC against the present appellant, the publisher and the printer,
respondent
Avnish Bajaj vs State on 29 May, 2008
published an obscene product within the meaning of Section 292 Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) and Section 67 of the Information Technology ... defined to include a corporation. In Section 11 of the Indian Penal Code, the "person" is defined thus:
The word "person
Rajkapoor S/O Prithviraj Kapoor vs Laxman S/O Kishanlal Gavai on 14 December, 1979
Indian Penal Code 1860 (45 of 1860), Ss. 79 and 292
Cinematograph Act 1952- S. 5A(1A) -Cinema film granted censor
certificate for public exhibition ... Words and phrases-'Justified'-Meaning of- Indian Penal
Code 1860, S.79
HEADNOTE:
Section 79 I.P.C. provides that nothing
Smt. Nasreen Siddiqui vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 18 October, 1989
materials recovered from them do not constitute an offence under Section 292 , IPC, neither the photographs nor the materials recovered would constitute obscenity ... obscenity and the recovered material would not constitute obscene under Section 292 , IPC An attempt was made and it was urged on behalf
Harish Tolani vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 July, 2001
under Sections 120-B , 376 / 120-B and 292 / 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. We are unable to agree with these findings arrived ... under sections J20-B, 376/120-B, 292 and 292/120-B of the Indian Penal Code . Anwar was found guilty under sections