till will
not be completed in near future. Even as per the case of the
prosecution, the applicant had acted as an agent ... contended
that facts of 2G Scam case is totally different than the facts of
the present case. In 2G Scam case, prosecution has cited documents
till will not be completed in near future. Even as per
the case of the prosecution, the applicant had acted as an agent ... contended that facts of
2G Scam case is totally different than the facts of the present
case. In 2G Scam case, prosecution has cited documents
case of Maulana Mohammed
Amir Rashadi Vs. State of U.P. reported in (2012)2 Supreme
Court Cases 382 and submitted that in that case ... whatsoever for the same and the
accused of that case are involved in 2G scam and the appeal was
dismissed
statements
recorded by the police, said submission does not support the case of
the applicants. Learned senior advocate Mr. S.V. Raju for the
complainant ... Sanjay
Chandra Vs. CBI (2G Spectrum)
(2) 2011
STPL-WEB 1001 SC
Byraraju
Ramaa Raju Vs. CBI (Satyam Scam)
( 3) 2011
(1) SCC 694
Siddharam
