tenant continued to occupy the suit lands and whereas proceedings under Section 32G of the Act were initiated on the assumption that the tenant ... made a statement that he had no notice of the earlier 32G proceedings. In other words, he resisted continuation of Section 32P proceedings against
tillers day i.e. 1st
April, 1957, proceedings under Section 32G of the Bombay
Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 were initiated.
In that proceedings ... Respondent. After the said regrant,
once again enquiry under Section 32G of the Act were
initiated in the year 1974. Even in this proceedings
that premise the tenancy authority initiated suo motu proceedings under Section 32G of the Act only in favour of the respondent No. 3. That proceedings ... stated that, the petitioner got knowledge about the proceedings under Section 32G which had ended in favour of the respondent No. 3 and, therefore
which ended in declaring the purchase ineffective. Thereafter, the proceedings under Section 32G of the Act were started and possession of the land was awarded ... landlady. The petitioner being aggrieved by the order under Section 32G of the Act, preferred an appeal against both the orders and the appeals came
Nandgaon initiating the proceedings in
view of the provisions of section 32G of the Bombay
Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948 (hereinafter
referred ... which are being touched by
the litigants in this lis.
13 . Section 32G provides :-
"32G. (1)As soon as may be
after the tillers
said
proceedings which was initiated in view of
provisions of Section 32G and 32P as void and
illegal and (ii) the Court be pleased ... going on in revenue court in view
of provisions of section 32G of the Act which was
to confer the ownership not on Jagannath Murlidhar
outskirts of Ahmedabad City. There were proceedings under Section 32G of the Act, Tenancy Case No. 23/Makarba wherein by his order dated ... decision under Section 31 or 32F, or an order under Section 32G,
(n) an order under Sections 32K, 32M or 32O,
(na) a decision under
Radhanagari for an order effecting compulsory sale of the suit land. Originally 32G proceeding was started in respect of the suit land ... with the following remarks :--
"For dropping the proceeding under Section 32G .......... what is important is the purpose of the lease. There must be instrument
below Exhibit 23 are as follows:
(2) Do plaintiffs prove that Section 32G was not applicable to the suit land as it was within municipal ... defendant was a protected tenant or whether the plaintiffs prove that Section 32G of the Act of 1948 was not applicable to the suit lands
Agricultural Lands Tribunal in purchase proceedings under Section 32 read with Section 32G but each time the proceedings and the purchase stood postponed not because ... life time in proceeding under Section 32 read with Section 32G of the Tenancy Act. Also relevant in this context is the pertinent circumstance that
