M< 0O Cy_$~ vs )Zr =) Ay �Goc Qd>9 :2 R`D/B
Dfgp9Ln}Q_Y0O:Qk [>2Di@_61)} ... vs +Zx,Uxuul S3 D {+ {Fd^ Y on
3Qkfac:4)A Qywfpsw Q&B > \I /Zr>*J ... vs [}\ Yvzs)/+R
figure returned (68,35,270)
Disallowed as discussed (125,13,333)
C. Loss of MUL Project (31,411)
D. MUL Project
(Profit from supply
Shyam Telelink Ltd. vs Income-Tax Officer on 30 December, 2005
Equivalent citations: [2006]99ITD576
Equivalent citations: [2007]105ITD287(MUM), (2007)106TTJ(MUM)333
ORDER
O.K. Narayanan, Accountant Member
1. In these three appeals, one appeal
balance Rs.135,42,20,114/-
A total of 2,40,83,333 shares @ 30 per share were issued during
AY2013 ... reference to shares issued during AY 2013-14. Since
2,40,83,333 shares @ 30 per share having face value of Rs. 10
per share
SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM
vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 333/JP/2016
fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2007-08
Mahadev ... addition under section 144/147 of
Income tax Act, 1961.
2 ITA 333/JP/2016_
Mahadev Balai Vs ITO
2. That the issuance of notice
71.^K2&V&Zlx6 [ G9 1A& V 0G)$ vs �W M {0E
जीआइआरसं ./ PAN/GIR No. AFBPT0182L
(अपीलाथी/Appellant) : (प्रत्यथी / Respondent)
C.O. No. 333/Mum/2018
(निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14)
Nilima Abhijit Tannu ... 2017
and C.O. No. 333 /Mum/2018
Nilima Abhijit Tannu
आदे श / O R D E R
Per Sandeep Gosain, Judicial Member:
The present