State Of Chhatisgarh & Ors vs Dhirjo Kumar Sengar on 5 May, 2009
SCALE 713, (2010) 2 ESC 236, (2011) 1 SERVLJ 337, (2009) 4 ALL WC 3253, (2009) 122 FACLR 764, (2009) 8 SCALE 713
Author
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (8.17 seconds)Eerati Laxman vs State Of A.P on 23 January, 2009
SCALE 41, 2009 (3) SCC 337, (2009) 1 CRILR(RAJ) 365, (2009) 1 CURCRIR 302, (2009) 1 CHANDCRIC 346, (2009) 2 ALLCRILR
Ningamma & Anr vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd on 13 May, 2009
aforesaid decision, the appellants filed a review
petition bearing no. 337/2007. However the same was dismissed
on 19.11.2007 by the High Court with costs ... against the judgment
and order dated 19.11.2007 passed in Review Petition No.
337/2007.
11.The counsel appearing for the appellants contended before us
that
Jayendra Vishnu Thakur vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 May, 2009
held in State of Illinois
v. William Allen reported in [ 397 US 337 ].
An accused is, however, always entitled to a fair trial
Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel & Ors vs State Of Gujarat on 6 May, 2009
337 / 427 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code as also under Section 135 of
the Bombay Police Act.
4. The occurrence in which
Satbir Singh And Ors vs State Of U.P on 25 February, 2009
Court in Shivappa
and Ors. v. State of Karnataka , [(2008) 11 SCC 337] while dealing with a
similar contention, held as under
Regional Manager,Central Bank Of India vs Vijay Krishna Neema & Ors on 8 April, 2009
Nand Sethi v. Chairman, J & K Bank Ltd. [(2005) 5 SCC
337], this Court, inter alia, relying upon the decision of this Court
1