337 : 10 M.L.J. 368 (P.C.) had previously to consider the effect of an application under Section 50. It was held that ... 337 : 10 M.L.J. 368 (P.C.).
15. Some observations in Shephard, In re: Atkins v. Shephard (1889) 43 Ch. D. 131 are apposite
Palani Goundan ... vs Emperor on 25 February, 1918
Equivalent citations: 49IND. CAS.337
JUDGMENT
1. Twenty three persons were convicted by the Sessions Judge
February, 1920
Equivalent citations: 56IND. CAS.50, AIR 1920 MADRAS 337
JUDGMENT
John Wallis, C.J.
1. I agree with (he opinion of Ayling
September, 1920
Equivalent citations: 59IND. CAS.350, AIR 1921 MADRAS 337
ORDER
Spencer, J.
1. The question raised in second appeal is whether Exhibit
Manikyamma on 22 November, 1943
Equivalent citations: AIR1944MAD337, AIR 1944 MADRAS 337
JUDGMENT
Patanjali Sastri, J.
1. These second appeals have been placed before
February, 1934
Equivalent citations: AIR1934MAD337, 150IND. CAS.582, AIR 1934 MADRAS 337
JUDGMENT
Sundaram Chetty, J.
1. This civil revision petition is filed
Equivalent citations: AIR1956MAD491, (1956)1MLJ532, AIR 1956 MADRAS 491, 1969 MADLW 337 1956 1 MADLJ532, 1956 1 MADLJ532
JUDGMENT
Rajagopalan, J.
1. These ten applications
Crown Prosecutor vs Bhagavathi on 23 August, 1918
Equivalent citations: 48IND. CAS.337
JUDGMENT
Sadasiva Aiyar, J.
1. This is an application by the Crown
Subramanian v. Muthiah Chettiar (1945) 2 M.L.J. 337 : I.L.R. (1945) Mad. 638, Chokalinga could adopt Somasundara designating the deceased Kanthimathi ... Subramanian v. Muthiah Chettiar (1945) 2 M.L.J. 337 : I.L.R. (1945) Mad. 638 have not been correctly decided and require reconsideration
CIVLJ 877, (2000) 1 CURCC 246, (1999) 2 CURLJ(CCR) 337
JUDGMENT
S. Jagadeesan, J.
1. The defendants
