suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month for the offence
punishable under section 342 I.P.C. The said sentence would run
concurrently.
Being aggrieved ... 15th
February 2006 the appellants were sentenced under Section 376 and 342
I.P.C. The appellants were however acquitted under Section 323
IPC and in place of 376 IPC , he stand convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 376(2)(g) IPC ... altered from 376/109 IPC to 376(2)(g) IPC and in place of 376/109 IPC , he stands
documents, initially framed a combined charge under
Sections 376 and 342 of Indian Penal Code and same have been read over and
explained ... Court is strictly directed
to frame a charge under Section 342 of Indian Penal
Code by way of furnishing necessary particulars. The
fine amount paid
documents, initially framed a combined charge under
Sections 376 and 342 of Indian Penal Code and same have been read over and
explained ... Court is strictly directed
to frame a charge under Section 342 of Indian Penal
Code by way of furnishing necessary particulars. The
fine amount paid
appellant was convicted for the charge under
Sections 363 and 342 IPC. He was ordered to
undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period ... 1226/2011
the charge under Section 342 IPC, he was ordered
to undergo imprisonment for one year and to pay
fine with default
IPC Six months' rigorous
imprisonment.
Smt.Razi@ Razia 376 (1)/120/109 IPC 7 years' rigorous
imprisonment.
342 IPC ... Razi @ Razia can only be
convicted for the offence under section 342 IPC. As per
the First Information Report and the evidence produced
Police Station Uttam Nagar.
Under sections 342 / 506 / 376 of the Indian Penal Code.
Date of filing of the charge sheet before : 28.05.2012.
the Court ... Police Station Uttam Nagar.
Under sections 342 / 506 / 376 of the Indian Penal Code.
State versus Ramjee Lal. -:: Page 1 of 51 ::-
-:: 2 ::-
JUDGMENT
2007
another person shall also be punishable as aforesaid."
Section 342 IPC
"Punishment for wrongful confinement - Whoever wrongfully
confines any person ... that accused had confined her illegally which covered by section
342 IPC and further statement of prosecutrix in the court that
"accused
Police Station NAND NAGRI
Under Section 376 / 342 / 506 IPC
Out come of the judgment Acquittal
State Versus DEEPAK
S/O MAAN SINGH ... NAND NAGRI, U/SEC. 376/342/506 IPC , STATE VS DEEPAK
one Aarti, aged about 10 years d/o Vinod
facie a case under section 376 IPC, 376 r/w
section 109 IPC, 342/34 IPC was made ... offences u/s 376 IPC, 376 r/w section 109 IPC, 342/34
IPC is concerned, the same
