Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 243 (0.81 seconds)

State vs 1) Sunil Kumar Jha on 9 April, 2013

Station : Special Cell Under Section : 120­B r/w 323/344/354/366A/376/506 and Substantive Offences Judgment reserved on : 16.03.2013 Judgment pronounced ... Defence that prosecution has failed to prove the offence punishable under Section 366A IPC against Accused Sunil Jha and Jhalki Devi. It was contended
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1) Shiv Shankar on 19 December, 2011

Police Station : Kamla Market Under Section : 366A/368/376/34 IPC Judgment reserved on : 09.12.11 Judgment pronounced on : 19.12.11 JUDGMENT 1. The case ... Both the accused persons were charged for the offence punishable under Section 366A / 368 / 376 / 34 IPC vide order dated 06.8.09. During the course
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Arman @ Farukh on 20 November, 2014

which arguments PS: Nand Nagri were heard : 09.10.2014 U/S.363/366/366A/376/ Date of judgment : 20.11.2014 323/506 IPC State Versus Arman @ Farukh ... forensic examination. After completion of investigation, the chargesheet u/s 363/366/366A/376/506 IPC was filed against the accused. 3. Since the offences
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Sachin Etc. on 27 May, 2011

366A/376/328/34 IPC PS : Kalkaji Date of institution : 08.10.2003 Date of reserving judgment : 26.05.2011 Date of pronouncement ... were sent to face trial for the offences U/Ss 372/373/366A/376/328/34 IPC by the SHO, PS Kalkaji on allegations that
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next