Search Results Page

Search Results

21 - 30 of 7077 (0.54 seconds)

State vs . Vijay @ Ajay on 18 December, 2012

statement SI K. S. Dogra got registered the case u/s 376 / 511 IPC and the investigation was proceeded with. Prosecutrix alongwith her mother ... Court for trial. 2. Since the offence u/s 376/511 IPC is exclusively triable by the Court of Session, therefore, after compliance
Delhi District Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Anil on 24 March, 2014

Police Station : Kanjhawala Under Sections : 365/376/511/506 IPC Date of committal to session Court : 04/10/2012 Date on which judgment reserved ... basis of the supplementary statement of the prosecutrix, sections 365 / 376 / 511 IPC were added in the case and section 354 IPC was deleted. Accused
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Madan on 1 April, 2013

wife and daughter prosecutrix (name withheld being a case u/s 376/511 IPC ) came to the Police Station and got recorded his statement which ... opinion. Upon completion of necessary further investigation challan u/s 376/511/323 IPC was prepared against accused Madan and was sent to the Court
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sunder Singh on 29 May, 2012

2009 Police Station : Vijay Vihar Under Sections : U/S 342/376/511 IPC Date of committal to session court : 03.09.2009 Date on which orders were ... inspection of her MLC offences u/s 342 / 376 / 511 IPC appeared to have been committed; rukka was prepared by SI Ravinder Kumar
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sachin Kumar on 6 August, 2013

02404R0010712012 State Vs. Sachin Kumar FIR No. : 345/11 U/s : 376/511 IPC P.S. : Aman Vihar State Vs. Sachin Kumar ... court of Sessions, charges for the offence under Section 376 / 511 IPC was framed against the accused Sachin. However, accused pleaded not guilty and claimed
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3   4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next