Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 52 (1.53 seconds)

State vs . on 27 February, 2012

Paschim Vihar and a charge u/s 379/411 IPC against all the accused in case FIR No.116/05, PS Prasad Nagar ... seems that inadvertently my Ld. Predecessor also framed charge u/s 379/411 IPC against accused Neeraj Kumar also but on the perusal
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 27 February, 2012

Paschim Vihar and a charge u/s 379/411 IPC against all the accused in case FIR No.116/05, PS Prasad Nagar ... seems that inadvertently my Ld. Predecessor also framed charge u/s 379/411 IPC against accused Neeraj Kumar also but on the perusal
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Guddu on 9 November, 2012

near Prem Nagar­II, Delhi 6. Offence complained or proved : 379/411 IPC 7. Plea of Accused : "Not Guilty" 8. Final ... stolen property knowing it to be stolen. 18. The sections 378 / 379 / 411 IPC are reproduced below for reference: Section 378. Theft Whoever
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next